Go to The Journal of Clinical Investigation
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
  • Physician-Scientist Development
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • By specialty
    • COVID-19
    • Cardiology
    • Immunology
    • Metabolism
    • Nephrology
    • Oncology
    • Pulmonology
    • All ...
  • Videos
  • Collections
    • In-Press Preview
    • Resource and Technical Advances
    • Clinical Research and Public Health
    • Research Letters
    • Editorials
    • Perspectives
    • Physician-Scientist Development
    • Reviews
    • Top read articles

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Specialties
  • In-Press Preview
  • Resource and Technical Advances
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Research Letters
  • Editorials
  • Perspectives
  • Physician-Scientist Development
  • Reviews
  • Top read articles
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
Human lung tumor FOXP3+ Tregs upregulate four “Treg-locking” transcription factors
Tatiana Akimova, Tianyi Zhang, Dmitri Negorev, Sunil Singhal, Jason Stadanlick, Abhishek Rao, Michael Annunziata, Matthew H. Levine, Ulf H. Beier, Joshua M. Diamond, Jason D. Christie, Steven M. Albelda, Evgeniy B. Eruslanov, Wayne W. Hancock
Tatiana Akimova, Tianyi Zhang, Dmitri Negorev, Sunil Singhal, Jason Stadanlick, Abhishek Rao, Michael Annunziata, Matthew H. Levine, Ulf H. Beier, Joshua M. Diamond, Jason D. Christie, Steven M. Albelda, Evgeniy B. Eruslanov, Wayne W. Hancock
View: Text | PDF
Research Article Immunology

Human lung tumor FOXP3+ Tregs upregulate four “Treg-locking” transcription factors

  • Text
  • PDF
Abstract

Experimental data indicate that FOXP3+ Tregs can markedly curtail host antitumor immune responses, but the properties of human intratumoral Tregs are still largely unknown, in part due to significant methodologic problems. We studied the phenotypic, functional, epigenetic, and transcriptional features of Tregs in 92 patients with non–small-cell lung cancer, comparing the features of Tregs within tumors versus corresponding blood, lung, and lymph node samples. Intratumoral Treg numbers and suppressive function were significantly increased compared with all other sites but did not display a distinctive phenotype by flow cytometry. However, by undertaking simultaneous evaluation of mRNA and protein expression at the single-cell level, we demonstrated that tumor Tregs have a phenotype characterized by upregulated expression of FOXP3 mRNA and protein as well as significantly increased expression of EOS, IRF4, SATB1, and GATA1 transcription factor mRNAs. Expression of these “Treg-locking” transcription factors was positively correlated with levels of FOXP3 mRNA, with highest correlations for EOS and SATB1. EOS had an additional, FOXP3 mRNA–independent, positive correlation with FOXP3 protein in tumor Tregs. Our study identifies distinctive features of intratumoral Tregs and suggests that targeting Treg-locking transcription factors, especially EOS, may be of clinical importance for antitumor Treg-based therapy.

Authors

Tatiana Akimova, Tianyi Zhang, Dmitri Negorev, Sunil Singhal, Jason Stadanlick, Abhishek Rao, Michael Annunziata, Matthew H. Levine, Ulf H. Beier, Joshua M. Diamond, Jason D. Christie, Steven M. Albelda, Evgeniy B. Eruslanov, Wayne W. Hancock

×

Figure 4

Assessment of intratumoral Treg chemokine receptor expression.

Options: View larger image (or click on image) Download as PowerPoint
Assessment of intratumoral Treg chemokine receptor expression.
(A) CCR4,...
(A) CCR4, (B) CCR5, (C) CCR7, (D) CCR8, (E) CXCR3, (F) CXCR4, and (G) CXCR5 expression were evaluated in CD4+FOXP3+ Tregs versus CD4+FOXP3– Teffs in different samples, using at least 4 samples/group. (H) CXCR5 expression in Tregs versus Teffs were evaluated in lung LNs from patients with adenocarcinoma or squamous cell carcinomas (LNs, lung cancers, n = 11) versus LNs from patients with lung metastases of colon cancer or melanoma or with pulmonary sarcoidosis (n = 3, LNs, not lung cancers). (I) Expression of CD62L was evaluated in Tregs versus Teffs in different samples, using at least 11 samples/group. The following statistics were used: 2-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons test for row factor, a location of either Tregs or Teffs (PBMCs versus LNs versus tumors etc.), and with Sidak’s multiple comparisons test for column factor to compare expression in Tregs versus Teffs. *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ****P < 0.0001. For A–G, only significant values in row factor in Tregs are shown in figures, full data are presented in Supplemental Tables 8 and 9. Blue lines indicate comparisons between Tregs, red lines indicate comparisons between Teffs, and black lines indicate comparisons between Tregs and Teffs.

Copyright © 2026 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN 2379-3708

Sign up for email alerts