Go to The Journal of Clinical Investigation
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
  • Physician-Scientist Development
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • By specialty
    • COVID-19
    • Cardiology
    • Immunology
    • Metabolism
    • Nephrology
    • Oncology
    • Pulmonology
    • All ...
  • Videos
  • Collections
    • In-Press Preview
    • Resource and Technical Advances
    • Clinical Research and Public Health
    • Research Letters
    • Editorials
    • Perspectives
    • Physician-Scientist Development
    • Reviews
    • Top read articles

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Specialties
  • In-Press Preview
  • Resource and Technical Advances
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Research Letters
  • Editorials
  • Perspectives
  • Physician-Scientist Development
  • Reviews
  • Top read articles
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
Optimized multiplex immunofluorescence single-cell analysis reveals tuft cell heterogeneity
Eliot T. McKinley, Yunxia Sui, Yousef Al-Kofahi, Bryan A. Millis, Matthew J. Tyska, Joseph T. Roland, Alberto Santamaria-Pang, Christina L. Ohland, Christian Jobin, Jeffrey L. Franklin, Ken S. Lau, Michael J. Gerdes, Robert J. Coffey
Eliot T. McKinley, Yunxia Sui, Yousef Al-Kofahi, Bryan A. Millis, Matthew J. Tyska, Joseph T. Roland, Alberto Santamaria-Pang, Christina L. Ohland, Christian Jobin, Jeffrey L. Franklin, Ken S. Lau, Michael J. Gerdes, Robert J. Coffey
View: Text | PDF
Resource and Technical Advance Gastroenterology

Optimized multiplex immunofluorescence single-cell analysis reveals tuft cell heterogeneity

  • Text
  • PDF
Abstract

Intestinal tuft cells are a rare, poorly understood cell type recently shown to be a critical mediator of type 2 immune response to helminth infection. Here, we present advances in segmentation algorithms and analytical tools for multiplex immunofluorescence (MxIF), a platform that enables iterative staining of over 60 antibodies on a single tissue section. These refinements have enabled a comprehensive analysis of tuft cell number, distribution, and protein expression profiles as a function of anatomical location and physiological perturbations. Based solely on DCLK1 immunoreactivity, tuft cell numbers were similar throughout the mouse small intestine and colon. However, multiple subsets of tuft cells were uncovered when protein coexpression signatures were examined, including two new intestinal tuft cell markers, Hopx and EGFR phosphotyrosine 1068. Furthermore, we identified dynamic changes in tuft cell number, composition, and protein expression associated with fasting and refeeding and after introduction of microbiota to germ-free mice. These studies provide a foundational framework for future studies of intestinal tuft cell regulation and demonstrate the utility of our improved MxIF computational methods and workflow for understanding cellular heterogeneity in complex tissues in normal and disease states.

Authors

Eliot T. McKinley, Yunxia Sui, Yousef Al-Kofahi, Bryan A. Millis, Matthew J. Tyska, Joseph T. Roland, Alberto Santamaria-Pang, Christina L. Ohland, Christian Jobin, Jeffrey L. Franklin, Ken S. Lau, Michael J. Gerdes, Robert J. Coffey

×

Figure 4

Intestinal tuft cell number and expression patterns.

Options: View larger image (or click on image) Download as PowerPoint
Intestinal tuft cell number and expression patterns.
(A) The proportion ...
(A) The proportion of tuft cells in the small intestinal epithelium was increased following fasting and remained elevated after 24 hours of refeeding (*P = 0.0320, **P = 0.0064; n = 3). Similarly, the colon showed an increase in the fraction of tuft cells after fasting and refeeding; however, these results did not reach statistical significance. (B) Circular plots demonstrate the proportion of each cell expression profile for each tuft cell marker. Statistically significant changes in expression profiles between sites and conditions are denoted by bold outlines and colors. Two expression profiles were different between tuft cells in the small intestine and colon at homeostasis (blue: P = 0.0038, green: P < 0.0001; n = 3 for each condition). (C) The proportion of tuft cells in the colon was increased 1 week after introduction of microorganisms compared to germ-free mice (***P = 0.0024; n = 4) but was unchanged 8 weeks after introduction of microorganisms or in specific pathogen–free (SPF) mice. (D) Overall, 7 tuft cell expression profiles were significantly different between germ-free mice and mice inoculated with microbiota for 1 week. Statistically significant changes in expression profiles between sites and conditions are denoted by bold outlines and colors (clockwise from top of plot: P = 0.0197, P = 0.0415, P = 0.0137, P = 0.0291, P = 0.0006, P = 0.0074, P = 0.0005; n = 4 for each condition). Two-tailed Student’s t test was used for statistical comparisons.

Copyright © 2026 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN 2379-3708

Sign up for email alerts