Go to The Journal of Clinical Investigation
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
  • Physician-Scientist Development
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • By specialty
    • COVID-19
    • Cardiology
    • Immunology
    • Metabolism
    • Nephrology
    • Oncology
    • Pulmonology
    • All ...
  • Videos
  • Collections
    • In-Press Preview
    • Resource and Technical Advances
    • Clinical Research and Public Health
    • Research Letters
    • Editorials
    • Perspectives
    • Physician-Scientist Development
    • Reviews
    • Top read articles

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Specialties
  • In-Press Preview
  • Resource and Technical Advances
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Research Letters
  • Editorials
  • Perspectives
  • Physician-Scientist Development
  • Reviews
  • Top read articles
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
Metastasis regulation by PPARD expression in cancer cells
Xiangsheng Zuo, Weiguo Xu, Min Xu, Rui Tian, Micheline J. Moussalli, Fei Mao, Xiaofeng Zheng, Jing Wang, Jeffrey S. Morris, Mihai Gagea, Cathy Eng, Scott Kopetz, Dipen M. Maru, Asif Rashid, Russell Broaddus, Daoyan Wei, Mien-Chie Hung, Anil K. Sood, Imad Shureiqi
Xiangsheng Zuo, Weiguo Xu, Min Xu, Rui Tian, Micheline J. Moussalli, Fei Mao, Xiaofeng Zheng, Jing Wang, Jeffrey S. Morris, Mihai Gagea, Cathy Eng, Scott Kopetz, Dipen M. Maru, Asif Rashid, Russell Broaddus, Daoyan Wei, Mien-Chie Hung, Anil K. Sood, Imad Shureiqi
View: Text | PDF
Research Article Oncology

Metastasis regulation by PPARD expression in cancer cells

  • Text
  • PDF
Abstract

Peroxisome proliferator–activated receptor–δ (PPARD) is upregulated in many major human cancers, but the role that its expression in cancer cells has in metastasis remains poorly understood. Here, we show that specific PPARD downregulation or genetic deletion of PPARD in cancer cells significantly repressed metastasis in various cancer models in vivo. Mechanistically, PPARD promoted angiogenesis via interleukin 8 in vivo and in vitro. Analysis of transcriptome profiling of HCT116 colon cancer cells with or without genetic deletion of PPARD and gene expression patterns in The Cancer Genome Atlas colorectal adenocarcinoma database identified novel pro-metastatic genes (GJA1, VIM, SPARC, STC1, SNCG) as PPARD targets. PPARD expression in cancer cells drastically affected epithelial-mesenchymal transition, migration, and invasion, further underscoring its necessity for metastasis. Clinically, high PPARD expression in various major human cancers (e.g., colorectal, lung, breast) was associated with significantly reduced metastasis-free survival. Our results demonstrate that PPARD, a druggable protein, is an important molecular target in metastatic cancer.

Authors

Xiangsheng Zuo, Weiguo Xu, Min Xu, Rui Tian, Micheline J. Moussalli, Fei Mao, Xiaofeng Zheng, Jing Wang, Jeffrey S. Morris, Mihai Gagea, Cathy Eng, Scott Kopetz, Dipen M. Maru, Asif Rashid, Russell Broaddus, Daoyan Wei, Mien-Chie Hung, Anil K. Sood, Imad Shureiqi

×

Figure 3

PPARD is critical for HCT-116 colon cancer cells’ formation of lung and liver metastases in immunodeficient mice.

Options: View larger image (or click on image) Download as PowerPoint
PPARD is critical for HCT-116 colon cancer cells’ formation of lung and ...
(A and B) HCT116 parental (WT), PPARD-KO, PPARD-KO-PD, and PPARD-KO-C cells were injected via the tail vein into immunodeficient mice, and lung metastasis formation was evaluated 6 weeks later. (A) Representative photographs of formalin-fixed lungs. Arrows indicate metastases. (B) Numbers of lung metastases per mouse for each group (n = 15–18 per group). (C–E) HCT116 parental cells stably transfected with luciferase (WT) or HCT116-PPARD-KO cells were injected into the spleens of immunodeficient mice. The mice were then fed either a control diet or one containing GW0742 (1 mg/kg; n = 10–12 per group), and liver metastasis formation was evaluated by bioluminescence imaging 2 weeks after injection. Four weeks after injection, the mice were killed, and their liver tumors were weighed and photographed. (C) Liver metastases from the indicated groups were evaluated by bioluminescence imaging 2 weeks after cell injection. (D) Representative photographs of isolated livers 4 weeks after cell injection. Arrows indicate liver metastases. (E) Ratios of liver tumor weight to total liver weight per mouse. Scale bars: 1 cm. Values in B and E are mean ± SEM. Lines indicate means. *P < 0.01, ***P < 0.0001 (ANOVA).

Copyright © 2026 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN 2379-3708

Sign up for email alerts