Usage Information
Abstract
Aging is a major contributor to cardiovascular disease and mortality in older adults. Yet most preclinical and experimental cardiac studies fail to account for age as a primary biological variable, leaving a critical gap in our understanding of how aging contributes to disease progression. Bridging this gap requires integrating aging biology, cardiac pathophysiology, and cutting-edge biotechnology to uncover the mechanisms underlying age-related cardiac dysfunction. We offer a new approach methodologies (NAMs) perspective on how emerging bioengineering strategies may reshape the study of cardiac aging by enabling multidimensional monitoring of cardiac function, aging trajectories, and therapeutic responses. To capture this complexity, we propose the A×G×E×D framework, where A stands for age, G for genetics, E for environment, and D for drug exposure, as a multidimensional lens for understanding how these factors converge to determine cardiac vulnerability during aging. We highlight the integration of long-term cardiac microtissues with advancements in biotechnology to model age. This Perspective opens new frontiers for understanding how A×G×E×D interactions manifest at the molecular, cellular, and electrophysiological levels and for designing responsive, personalized interventions that align with each individual’s evolving physiology. By developing robust bioengineered platforms that recapitulate human cardiac aging, we can advance toward precision geromedicine for cardiovascular health.
Authors
Kritika Chaddha, Mabel Bartlett, Tzahi Cohen-Karni, Aditi Gurkar
Usage data is cumulative from August 2026 through August 2026.
| Usage | JCI | PMC |
|---|---|---|
| Text version | 225 | 0 |
| 62 | 0 | |
| Figure | 69 | 0 |
| Table | 9 | 0 |
| Citation downloads | 27 | 0 |
| Totals | 392 | 0 |
| Total Views | 392 | |
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.
