Go to The Journal of Clinical Investigation
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
  • Physician-Scientist Development
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • By specialty
    • COVID-19
    • Cardiology
    • Immunology
    • Metabolism
    • Nephrology
    • Oncology
    • Pulmonology
    • All ...
  • Videos
  • Collections
    • In-Press Preview
    • Resource and Technical Advances
    • Clinical Research and Public Health
    • Research Letters
    • Editorials
    • Perspectives
    • Physician-Scientist Development
    • Reviews
    • Top read articles

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Specialties
  • In-Press Preview
  • Resource and Technical Advances
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Research Letters
  • Editorials
  • Perspectives
  • Physician-Scientist Development
  • Reviews
  • Top read articles
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
RAS signaling in lung adenocarcinoma is defined by lineage context and DUSP4 loss
Minjeong Kim, Wisut Lamlertthon, Heejoon Jo, Yan Cui, Miyeon Yeon, Hyo Young Choi, Katherine A. Hoadley, Matthew P. Smeltzer, Michele C. Hayward, Matthew D. Wilkerson, Liza Makowski, D. Neil Hayes
Minjeong Kim, Wisut Lamlertthon, Heejoon Jo, Yan Cui, Miyeon Yeon, Hyo Young Choi, Katherine A. Hoadley, Matthew P. Smeltzer, Michele C. Hayward, Matthew D. Wilkerson, Liza Makowski, D. Neil Hayes
View: Text | PDF
Clinical Research and Public Health Cell biology Clinical Research Oncology

RAS signaling in lung adenocarcinoma is defined by lineage context and DUSP4 loss

  • Text
  • PDF
Abstract

BACKGROUND The molecular landscape of lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) is often illustrated as a driver-oncogene pie chart, but identical mutations exhibit heterogeneous signaling shaped by comutations, transcriptional programs, and lineage context. We propose a lineage-integrated signaling framework using an EGFR mutation signature (mSig).METHODS We defined EGFR mSig using differentially expressed genes in EGFR-mutant (EGFR-mt) LUADs. Semisupervised clustering and machine learning models were used to test reproducibility in different combinations of datasets. We analyzed molecular subtypes, lineage markers, co-occurring mutations, and EGFR copy number alterations in EGFR mSig-defined subtypes of LUAD.RESULTS EGFR mSig showed robust classification performance (area under receiver operating characteristic curve = 0.83–0.95; mean negative predictive value = 96.3%). Validated gene expression subtypes and lung lineage markers were closely aligned with EGFR mSig status. Most EGFR mSig+ tumors, including many without EGFR mutations, belonged to the bronchioid subtype. A subset of canonical RAS mutations were mSig+ and mirrored the EGFR mutation pattern. EGFR WT/mSig– tumors were enriched for nonbronchioid subtypes and had comutations in TP53 or RAS/RAF/RTKs. We highlight a parsimonious collection of coordinated mutations, including RAS, KEAP1, STK11, TP53, and CDKN2A, that taken together suggest coordination of tumor signaling previously suggested but now reproduced and expanded.CONCLUSION A potentially novel EGFR mSig that captures the transcriptional footprint of EGFR activation revealed a subset of EGFR WT LUADs with mt-like features. mSig refines LUAD taxonomy beyond mutation-only pie-chart models by incorporating lineage and comutation context. Lineage-directed stratification with coalteration identifies clinically relevant groups across EGFR and RAS states and highlights treatment opportunities for patients currently considered oncogene-negative.FUNDING National Cancer Institute (NCI) U01CA272541, R01CA262296, U24CA264021, UG1CA233333, R01CA211939.

Authors

Minjeong Kim, Wisut Lamlertthon, Heejoon Jo, Yan Cui, Miyeon Yeon, Hyo Young Choi, Katherine A. Hoadley, Matthew P. Smeltzer, Michele C. Hayward, Matthew D. Wilkerson, Liza Makowski, D. Neil Hayes

×
Problems with a PDF?

This file is in Adobe Acrobat (PDF) format. If you have not installed and configured the Adobe Acrobat Reader on your system.

Having trouble reading a PDF?

PDFs are designed to be printed out and read, but if you prefer to read them online, you may find it easier if you increase the view size to 125%.

Having trouble saving a PDF?

Many versions of the free Acrobat Reader do not allow Save. You must instead save the PDF from the JCI Online page you downloaded it from. PC users: Right-click on the Download link and choose the option that says something like "Save Link As...". Mac users should hold the mouse button down on the link to get these same options.

Having trouble printing a PDF?

  1. Try printing one page at a time or to a newer printer.
  2. Try saving the file to disk before printing rather than opening it "on the fly." This requires that you configure your browser to "Save" rather than "Launch Application" for the file type "application/pdf", and can usually be done in the "Helper Applications" options.
  3. Make sure you are using the latest version of Adobe's Acrobat Reader.

Supplemental data - Download (6.46 MB)

Advertisement

Copyright © 2026 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN 2379-3708

Sign up for email alerts