Usage Information
Abstract
Extracellular vesicles (EVs)-mediated inter-organ communication represents a promising frontier in transplant immunology; however, its role in cardiac allograft rejection remains poorly characterized. We performed proteomic profiling of plasma-derived EVs in a rat heterotopic heart transplantation model and identified a distinct liver-predominant protein signature during acute rejection, with Antithrombin III (ATIII) emerging as a top candidate. Functional validation revealed that pharmacological EV inhibition intensified systemic and intragraft inflammation, whereas adeno-associated virus (AAV)-mediated silencing of hepatic ATIII directly accelerated allograft rejection. Conversely, AAV-mediated hepatocyte-specific ATIII overexpression attenuated rejection pathology, reduced immune cell recruitment, and markedly prolonged median graft survival. This protective effect was achieved without evidence of coagulopathic complications, indicating an immunomodulatory mechanism beyond ATIII’s canonical anticoagulant function. Mechanistically, ATIII overexpression was associated with upregulation of heme oxygenase-1 (HO-1) in the liver and suppression of proinflammatory cytokine expression in the graft. These findings highlight hepatocyte-derived EVs as important mediators of a liver-heart signaling axis in transplant rejection, and further implicate the protein ATIII as a contributor to this axis. Our study reveals a therapeutically targetable liver-heart signaling axis in transplant rejection, whereby enhancing liver-derived ATIII or its downstream pathways (such as HO-1) could attenuate acute cardiac allograft rejection.
Authors
Shiyu Dai, Wei Zhou, Fangyu Chen, Huanyu Zhang, Zhenchun Ji, Xuejing Zong, Wanruo Zhang, Jie Hu, Shumin Jiang, Fei Wang, Zhenya Shen
Usage data is cumulative from July 2026 through July 2026.
| Usage | JCI | PMC |
|---|---|---|
| Text version | 109 | 0 |
| 43 | 0 | |
| Supplemental data | 19 | 0 |
| Citation downloads | 25 | 0 |
| Totals | 196 | 0 |
| Total Views | 196 | |
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.
