FOXP3+ Treg cells are critical for immune tolerance. Genetic deletion of the Forkhead domain–containing proteins of the FOXP-subfamily member FOXP1 from Tregs results in impaired function associated with reduced CD25 expression and IL-2 signaling, but to date the only other FOXP family member expressed in Tregs, FOXP4, has been minimally studied. To investigate the potential functional interactions among FOXP family members in Tregs, we specifically deleted Foxp1, Foxp4, or both in FOXP3+ committed Tregs in mice. Our findings show that mice with combined, but not individual, deficiency in FOXP1 and FOXP4 exhibit lymphoproliferation, inflammation, autoimmunity, and early lethality. The combined absence of FOXP1 and FOXP4 in Tregs results in an activated/effector-like phenotype with compromised suppressive function in peripheral lymphoid organs, an enhanced germinal center response, and proinflammatory cytokine production. We further show that FOXP1 and FOXP4 bind to Il2ra promoter regions to regulate CD25 expression in Tregs. Through pairwise comparison among mouse strains with Treg-specific deletion of Foxp1, Foxp4, or both, our findings indicate a nonredundant but insufficient role of FOXP4 in Treg function.
Dachuan Dong, Vishal J. Sindhava, Ananthakrishnan Ganesan, Martin S. Naradikian, Tom L. Stephen, Andrew Frisch, Kristen M. Valentine, Elizabeth Buza, Karla R. Wiehagen, Michael P. Cancro, Edward E. Morrisey, Haley Tucker, Katrina K. Hoyer, Purvesh Khatri, Jonathan S. Maltzman
Usage data is cumulative from August 2025 through February 2026.
| Usage | JCI | PMC |
|---|---|---|
| Text version | 1,641 | 93 |
| 443 | 22 | |
| Figure | 328 | 0 |
| Table | 19 | 0 |
| Supplemental data | 181 | 2 |
| Citation downloads | 101 | 0 |
| Totals | 2,713 | 117 |
| Total Views | 2,830 | |
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.