Usage Information
Citation Information: JCI Insight. 2025;10(14):e191930. https://doi.org/10.1172/jci.insight.191930.
Abstract
The widespread uptake of COVID-19 vaccines by women provided a unique opportunity to study the effects of pregnancy and lactation on immune responses to vaccination. Leveraging a cohort with well-defined SARS-CoV-2 exposure history, we found that the magnitude of humoral and cellular immune responses to vaccine-delivered SARS-CoV-2 spike was not affected by pregnancy or lactation status. However, vaccination during pregnancy elicited more stem-like SARS-CoV-2–specific CD4+ T cells. Moreover, breakthrough infection promoted spike-specific IgG in pregnant individuals in contrast with IgA in those lactating, suggesting that the pregnancy-to-lactation transition favors mucosal antibody responses. Breakthrough infection also reduced peripheral cytolytic SARS-CoV-2–specific CD8+ T cell frequencies during lactation but not pregnancy, which may reflect trafficking of the cells to mammary glands. Our study also uncovered an impact of pregnancy and lactation on global T cell phenotypes. In particular, lactating individuals preferentially exhibited a state of diminished T cell activation. Furthermore, breakthrough infection during pregnancy, but not lactation, diminished frequencies of activated CD8+ T cells, tissue-homing CD8+ T cells, and γδ T cells. Our findings support the notion that immunity during pregnancy and lactation adapts to benefit the fetus or breastfed infant, with implications for eliciting effective long-term immunity for these uniquely vulnerable groups.
Authors
Kailin Yin, Lin Li, Xiaoyu Luo, Jason Neidleman, Arianna G. Cassidy, Yarden Golan, Nida Ozarslan, Christine Y. Lin, Unurzul Jigmeddagva, Mikias Ilala, Megan A. Chidboy, Mary Prahl, Stephanie L. Gaw, Nadia R. Roan
Usage data is cumulative from July 2025 through December 2025.
| Usage | JCI | PMC |
|---|---|---|
| Text version | 1,680 | 156 |
| 335 | 34 | |
| Figure | 270 | 5 |
| Supplemental data | 94 | 3 |
| Citation downloads | 214 | 0 |
| Totals | 2,593 | 198 |
| Total Views | 2,791 | |
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.
