Go to The Journal of Clinical Investigation
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
  • Physician-Scientist Development
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • By specialty
    • COVID-19
    • Cardiology
    • Immunology
    • Metabolism
    • Nephrology
    • Oncology
    • Pulmonology
    • All ...
  • Videos
  • Collections
    • In-Press Preview
    • Resource and Technical Advances
    • Clinical Research and Public Health
    • Research Letters
    • Editorials
    • Perspectives
    • Physician-Scientist Development
    • Reviews
    • Top read articles

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Specialties
  • In-Press Preview
  • Resource and Technical Advances
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Research Letters
  • Editorials
  • Perspectives
  • Physician-Scientist Development
  • Reviews
  • Top read articles
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact

Usage Information

An insider’s guide to understanding and obtaining an NIH K career development award
Don C. Rockey, … , Charles W. Emala, Emily J. Gallagher
Don C. Rockey, … , Charles W. Emala, Emily J. Gallagher
Published June 23, 2025
Citation Information: JCI Insight. 2025;10(12):e191904. https://doi.org/10.1172/jci.insight.191904.
View: Text | PDF
Physician-Scientist Development Article has an altmetric score of 5

An insider’s guide to understanding and obtaining an NIH K career development award

  • Text
  • PDF
Abstract

Physician-scientists in academic medical centers require extramural grant support to launch and maintain their research careers. In order to cultivate the next generation of biomedical researchers, including physician-scientists, the NIH supports multiple career development (K series) awards. For many, their first experience in grant writing is composing a career development award (CDA) application. From the applicant’s perspective, this process can be difficult. For one, NIH institute–specific differences between the same K mechanism can be confusing. Additionally, the importance of the various elements that make up the K application are frequently misunderstood. Furthermore, many K applications will not be funded on the initial submission; therefore, the need to resubmit an application should not be viewed as a sign of failure, but rather can be viewed as an element of resilience in biomedical research. In this piece, we aim to provide guidance for aspiring K applicants — in particular, from the reviewer perspective — with the intent of making the application process more understandable. We offer dos and don’ts on different components of the K application, advice on when to reach out to a program officer, and tips on resubmission. Our overarching goal is to provide support for prospective K applicants in their effort to obtain a K award. While targeted to K applications, most of the contents of this summary apply to any CDA.

Authors

Don C. Rockey, Kyu Y. Rhee, Christopher S. Williams, Jatin M. Vyas, Charles W. Emala, Emily J. Gallagher

×

Usage data is cumulative from June 2025 through August 2025.

Usage JCI PMC
Text version 1,960 26
PDF 239 7
Figure 89 0
Table 522 0
Supplemental data 66 1
Citation downloads 37 0
Totals 2,913 34
Total Views 2,947
Created with Highcharts 3.0.9MonthTotalJun 2Jun 9Jun 16Jun 23Jun 30Jul 7Jul 14Jul 21Jul 280500100015002000250030003500
JCI Citation downloads
JCI Figure
JCI Text version
JCI PDF
JCI Supplemental data
JCI Table
PMC Text version
PMC PDF
PMC Supplemental data
Total JCI usage
Total PMC usage
Total usage

Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.

Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.

Advertisement

Copyright © 2025 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN 2379-3708

Sign up for email alerts

Posted by 9 X users
Referenced by 2 Bluesky users
1 readers on Mendeley
See more details