Go to The Journal of Clinical Investigation
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
  • Physician-Scientist Development
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • By specialty
    • COVID-19
    • Cardiology
    • Immunology
    • Metabolism
    • Nephrology
    • Oncology
    • Pulmonology
    • All ...
  • Videos
  • Collections
    • In-Press Preview
    • Resource and Technical Advances
    • Clinical Research and Public Health
    • Research Letters
    • Editorials
    • Perspectives
    • Physician-Scientist Development
    • Reviews
    • Top read articles

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Specialties
  • In-Press Preview
  • Resource and Technical Advances
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Research Letters
  • Editorials
  • Perspectives
  • Physician-Scientist Development
  • Reviews
  • Top read articles
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
An insider’s guide to understanding and obtaining an NIH K career development award
Don C. Rockey, … , Charles W. Emala, Emily J. Gallagher
Don C. Rockey, … , Charles W. Emala, Emily J. Gallagher
Published June 23, 2025
Citation Information: JCI Insight. 2025;10(12):e191904. https://doi.org/10.1172/jci.insight.191904.
View: Text | PDF
Physician-Scientist Development Article has an altmetric score of 5

An insider’s guide to understanding and obtaining an NIH K career development award

  • Text
  • PDF
Abstract

Physician-scientists in academic medical centers require extramural grant support to launch and maintain their research careers. In order to cultivate the next generation of biomedical researchers, including physician-scientists, the NIH supports multiple career development (K series) awards. For many, their first experience in grant writing is composing a career development award (CDA) application. From the applicant’s perspective, this process can be difficult. For one, NIH institute–specific differences between the same K mechanism can be confusing. Additionally, the importance of the various elements that make up the K application are frequently misunderstood. Furthermore, many K applications will not be funded on the initial submission; therefore, the need to resubmit an application should not be viewed as a sign of failure, but rather can be viewed as an element of resilience in biomedical research. In this piece, we aim to provide guidance for aspiring K applicants — in particular, from the reviewer perspective — with the intent of making the application process more understandable. We offer dos and don’ts on different components of the K application, advice on when to reach out to a program officer, and tips on resubmission. Our overarching goal is to provide support for prospective K applicants in their effort to obtain a K award. While targeted to K applications, most of the contents of this summary apply to any CDA.

Authors

Don C. Rockey, Kyu Y. Rhee, Christopher S. Williams, Jatin M. Vyas, Charles W. Emala, Emily J. Gallagher

×
Options: View larger image (or click on image) Download as PowerPoint
K08 and K23 funding rates

K08 and K23 funding rates


Copyright © 2025 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN 2379-3708

Sign up for email alerts

Posted by 9 X users
Referenced by 2 Bluesky users
1 readers on Mendeley
See more details