Usage Information
Citation Information: JCI Insight. 2025;10(6):e187889. https://doi.org/10.1172/jci.insight.187889.
Abstract
RESULTS. Participants with CAD (n = 723) had 12% higher mean relative levels of nHDLox compared with those with invasively excluded CAD (n = 502, P < 0.001). Patients presenting with symptoms of an ACS had the highest nHDLox values when compared with the elective cohort (median 1.35, IQR 0.97 to 1.85, P < 0.001). In multivariate analysis adjusted for age, sex, body mass index, and hypertension, nHDLox was a strong independent predictor of ACS (P < 0.001) but not of CAD (P > 0.05).CONCLUSION. HDL antioxidant function is reduced in patients with CAD. nHDLox is strongly associated with ACS. TRIAL REGISTRATION. German Clinical Trials Register DRKS00014037. FUNDING. Brandenburg Medical School Theodor Fontane, the BIOX Stiftung, and NIH grants R01AG059501 and R03AG059462. BACKGROUND. High-density lipoprotein (HDL) function rather than its concentration plays an important role in the pathogenesis of coronary artery disease (CAD). The aim of the present study was to determine whether reduced antioxidant function of HDL is associated with the presence of a stable CAD or acute coronary syndrome (ACS).METHODS. HDL function was measured in 2 cohorts: 1225 patients admitted electively for coronary angiography and 196 patients with ACS. A validated cell-free biochemical assay was used to determine reduced HDL antioxidant function, as assessed by increased HDL-lipid peroxide content (HDLox), which was normalized by HDL-C levels and the mean value of a pooled serum control from healthy participants (nHDLox; unitless). Results are expressed as median with interquartile range (IQR).
Authors
Benjamin Sasko, Linda Scharow, Rhea Mueller, Monique Jaensch, Werner Dammermann, Felix S. Seibert, Philipp Hillmeister, Ivo Buschmann, Martin Christ, Oliver Ritter, Nazha Hamdani, Christian Ukena, Timm H. Westhoff, Theodoros Kelesidis, Nikolaos Pagonas
Usage data is cumulative from March 2025 through April 2025.
| Usage | JCI | PMC |
|---|---|---|
| Text version | 477 | 0 |
| 208 | 0 | |
| Figure | 86 | 0 |
| Table | 86 | 0 |
| Supplemental data | 195 | 0 |
| Citation downloads | 41 | 0 |
| Totals | 1,093 | 0 |
| Total Views | 1,093 | |
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.
