Go to The Journal of Clinical Investigation
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
  • Physician-Scientist Development
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • By specialty
    • COVID-19
    • Cardiology
    • Immunology
    • Metabolism
    • Nephrology
    • Oncology
    • Pulmonology
    • All ...
  • Videos
  • Collections
    • In-Press Preview
    • Resource and Technical Advances
    • Clinical Research and Public Health
    • Research Letters
    • Editorials
    • Perspectives
    • Physician-Scientist Development
    • Reviews
    • Top read articles

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Specialties
  • In-Press Preview
  • Resource and Technical Advances
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Research Letters
  • Editorials
  • Perspectives
  • Physician-Scientist Development
  • Reviews
  • Top read articles
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
Unique characteristics of autoantibodies targeting MET in patients with breast and lung cancer
Michal Navon, Noam Ben-Shalom, Maya Dadiani, Michael Mor, Ron Yefet, Michal Bakalenik-Gavry, Dana Chat, Nora Balint-Lahat, Iris Barshack, Ilan Tsarfaty, Einav Nili Gal-Yam, Natalia T. Freund
Michal Navon, Noam Ben-Shalom, Maya Dadiani, Michael Mor, Ron Yefet, Michal Bakalenik-Gavry, Dana Chat, Nora Balint-Lahat, Iris Barshack, Ilan Tsarfaty, Einav Nili Gal-Yam, Natalia T. Freund
View: Text | PDF
Research Article Immunology

Unique characteristics of autoantibodies targeting MET in patients with breast and lung cancer

  • Text
  • PDF
Abstract

The presence of B cells in tumors is correlated with favorable prognosis and efficient response to immunotherapy. While tumor-reactive antibodies have been detected in several cancer types, identifying antibodies that specifically target tumor-associated antigens remains a challenge. Here, we investigated the antibodies spontaneously elicited during breast and lung cancer that bind the cancer-associated antigen MET. We screened patients with lung (n = 25) and breast (n = 75) cancer and found that 13% had antibodies binding to both the recombinant ectodomain of MET, and the ligand binding part of MET, SEMA. MET binding in the breast cancer cohort was significantly correlated with hormone receptor–positive status. We further conducted immunoglobulin sequencing of peripheral MET-enriched B cells from 6 MET-reactive patients. The MET-enriched B cell repertoire was found to be polyclonal and prone to non-IgG1 subclass. Nine monoclonal antibodies were cloned and analyzed, and these exhibited MET binding, low thermostability, and high polyreactivity. Among these, antibodies 87B156 and 69B287 effectively bound to tumor cells and inhibited MET-expressing breast cancer cell lines. Overall, our data demonstrate that some patients with breast and lung cancer develop polyreactive antibodies that cross-react with MET. These autoantibodies have a potential contribution to immune responses against tumors.

Authors

Michal Navon, Noam Ben-Shalom, Maya Dadiani, Michael Mor, Ron Yefet, Michal Bakalenik-Gavry, Dana Chat, Nora Balint-Lahat, Iris Barshack, Ilan Tsarfaty, Einav Nili Gal-Yam, Natalia T. Freund

×

Figure 1

Anti-MET response in a cohort of 100 patients with cancer.

Options: View larger image (or click on image) Download as PowerPoint
Anti-MET response in a cohort of 100 patients with cancer.
(A) Heatmap r...
(A) Heatmap representing cancer patient sera binding as detected by ELISA. Each column represents 1 donor (donor IDs are given on top). The left side of the heatmap presents breast cancer donors, while the right side presents lung cancer donors. The rows are based on raw OD650 values at a serum dilution of 1:50 for MET, SEMA, and gp120. Color code is given on the right of the figure, where light yellow indicates binding, and dark purple indicates lack of binding. The 13 identified patients who responded to MET are marked with red asterisks. (B) Mean OD of MET and SEMA binding of cancer patients (black/purple, n = 100) and non-cancer donors (green, n = 51). The dashed line indicates the 95th percentile of healthy donors’ sera scores (set as the threshold for defining anti-MET positive response). The 13 patients who responded to MET are colored in purple. (C) Mean OD of MET and SEMA binding for each patient, subdivided by cancer type, subtype (adenoCa = adenocarcinoma, SCC = squamous cell carcinoma, TN = triple negative), and stage (E = early, M = metastasis). The 13 patients who responded to MET are indicated in purple. (D) Pie charts showing the tumor hormonal receptor status (HR+ versus HR–) in 67 patients with breast cancer who did not respond to MET (left pie), as opposed to the 8 patients with breast cancer who responded to MET (right pie). *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01 by Kolmogorov-Smirnov test (B) or Fisher’s exact test (D).

Copyright © 2026 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN 2379-3708

Sign up for email alerts