Go to The Journal of Clinical Investigation
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
  • Physician-Scientist Development
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • By specialty
    • COVID-19
    • Cardiology
    • Immunology
    • Metabolism
    • Nephrology
    • Oncology
    • Pulmonology
    • All ...
  • Videos
  • Collections
    • In-Press Preview
    • Resource and Technical Advances
    • Clinical Research and Public Health
    • Research Letters
    • Editorials
    • Perspectives
    • Physician-Scientist Development
    • Reviews
    • Top read articles

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Specialties
  • In-Press Preview
  • Resource and Technical Advances
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Research Letters
  • Editorials
  • Perspectives
  • Physician-Scientist Development
  • Reviews
  • Top read articles
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
Orthotopic gastric cancer mouse model identifies trajectory of lymphatic metastasis
Huafeng Fu, … , Min Li, Dongjie Yang
Huafeng Fu, … , Min Li, Dongjie Yang
Published December 17, 2024
Citation Information: JCI Insight. 2025;10(2):e186565. https://doi.org/10.1172/jci.insight.186565.
View: Text | PDF
Research Letter Gastroenterology Oncology

Orthotopic gastric cancer mouse model identifies trajectory of lymphatic metastasis

  • Text
  • PDF
Abstract

Authors

Huafeng Fu, Qinbo Cai, Zhijun Zhou, Yulong He, Min Li, Dongjie Yang

×

Figure 1

Conserved perigastric lymphatic drainage network and lymph node metastasis in an orthotopic gastric cancer mouse model.

Options: View larger image (or click on image) Download as PowerPoint
Conserved perigastric lymphatic drainage network and lymph node metastas...
(A) Schematic diagram showing the injection of nanocarbon particles into the subserous layer of the stomach at multiple sites. (B–D) Perigastric lymphatic drainage network. LGA/V, left gastric artery/vein; smaLN, lymph node along the superior mesenteric artery. Scale bars: 5 mm. (E) Schematic diagram of orthotopic xenograft tumor model. A small piece of tumor tissue was implanted to the submucosal layer by an implantation needle. (F) Bioluminescence imaging was used to track tumor growth. (G) MR imaging was used to track tumor growth and lymphatic metastasis. Scale bar: 5 mm. (H) Statistics analysis on the size of lymph nodes in MR imaging (n = 4). (I) Gross images of the stomach and perigastric drainage lymph node of mice, and statistics analysis of the volume of lymph nodes (n = 4). (J) H&E and pan-cytokeratin (CK-pan) staining of stomach and perigastric lymph nodes. LVI, lymphovascular invasion. The magnification of representative images of gcLN, lcLN, caLNs and paLN were the same. (K) Schematic diagram showing the broad application of this orthotopic gastric cancer mouse model. LNM, lymph node metastasis. The arrows (B, G, I, and J) indicate the position of lymph nodes. Multiple unpaired 2-tailed t test was performed for statistical analysis. *P < 0.05 and ****P < 0.0001. Data represent mean ± SEM.

Copyright © 2025 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN 2379-3708

Sign up for email alerts