Usage Information
Abstract
BACKGROUND The high-dose quadrivalent influenza vaccine (QIV-HD) showed superior efficacy against laboratory-confirmed illness compared with the standard-dose quadrivalent influenza vaccine (QIV-SD) in randomized controlled trials with the elderly. However, specific underlying mechanism remains unclear.METHODS This phase IV randomized controlled trial compared early innate responses induced by QIV-HD and QIV-SD in 59 individuals aged > 65 years. Systemic innate cells and gene signatures at day 0 (D0) and D1 as well as hemagglutinin inhibition antibody (HIA) titers at D0 and D21 after vaccination were assessed.RESULTS QIV-HD elicited robust humoral response with significantly higher antibody titers and seroconversion rates than QIV-SD. At D1 after vaccination, QIV-HD recipients showed significant reduction in innate cells, including conventional DCs and NK cells, compared with QIV-SD, correlating with significantly increased HIA titers at D21. Blood transcriptomic analysis revealed greater amplitude of gene expression in the QIV-HD arm, encompassing genes related to innate immune response, IFNs, and antigen processing and presentation, and correlated with humoral responses. Interestingly, comparative analysis with a literature dataset from young adults vaccinated with influenza standard-dose vaccine highlighted strong similarities in gene expression patterns and biological pathways with the elderly vaccinated with QIV-HD.CONCLUSION QIV-HD induces higher HIA titers than QIV-SD, a youthful boost of the innate gene expression significantly associated with high HIA titers.TRIAL REGISTRATION EudraCT no. 2021-004573-32.
Authors
Olivia Bonduelle, Tristan Delory, Isabelle Franco-Moscardini, Marion Ghidi, Selma Bennacer, Michele Wokam, Mathieu Lenormand, Melissa Petrier, Olivier Rogeaux, Simon de Bernard, Karine Alves, Julien Nourikyan, Bruno Lina, INFLUOMICS Study group, Behazine Combadiere, Cécile Janssen
Usage data is cumulative from March 2025 through December 2025.
| Usage | JCI | PMC |
|---|---|---|
| Text version | 2,644 | 371 |
| 965 | 82 | |
| Figure | 494 | 0 |
| Supplemental data | 350 | 13 |
| Citation downloads | 128 | 0 |
| Totals | 4,581 | 466 |
| Total Views | 5,047 | |
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.
