BACKGROUND Two coding alleles within the APOL1 gene, G1 and G2, found almost exclusively in individuals genetically similar to West African populations, contribute substantially to the pathogenesis of chronic kidney disease (CKD). The APOL gene cluster on chromosome 22 contains a total of 6 APOL genes that have arisen as a result of gene duplication.METHODS Using a genome-first approach in the Penn Medicine BioBank, we identified 62 protein-altering variants in the 6 APOL genes with a minor allele frequency of >0.1% in a population of participants genetically similar to African reference populations and performed population-specific phenome-wide association studies.RESULTS We identified rs1108978, a stop-gain variant in APOL3 (p.Q58*), to be significantly associated with increased CKD risk, even after conditioning on APOL1 G1/G2 carrier status. These findings were replicated in the Veterans Affairs Million Veteran Program and the All of Us Research Program. APOL3 p.Q58* was also significantly associated with a number of quantitative traits linked to CKD, including decreased kidney volume. This truncating variant contributed the most risk for CKD in patients monoallelic for APOL1 G1/G2, suggesting an epistatic interaction and a potential protective effect of wild-type APOL3 against APOL1-induced kidney disease.CONCLUSION This study demonstrates the utility of targeting population-specific variants in a genome-first approach, even in the context of well-studied gene-disease relationships.FUNDING National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (F30HL172382, R01HL169378, R01HL169458), Doris Duke Foundation (grant 2023-2024), National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering (P41EB029460), and National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (UL1-TR-001878).
David Y. Zhang, Michael G. Levin, Jeffrey T. Duda, Latrice G. Landry, Walter R. Witschey, Scott M. Damrauer, Marylyn D. Ritchie, Daniel J. Rader
Usage data is cumulative from July 2025 through July 2026.
| Usage | JCI | PMC |
|---|---|---|
| Text version | 3,343 | 316 |
| 310 | 46 | |
| Figure | 430 | 2 |
| Table | 452 | 0 |
| Supplemental data | 502 | 20 |
| Citation downloads | 305 | 0 |
| Totals | 5,342 | 384 |
| Total Views | 5,726 | |
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.