Usage Information
Abstract
Parasympathetic dysfunction after chronic myocardial infarction (MI) is known to predispose ventricular tachyarrhythmias (ventricular tachycardia/ventricular fibrillation [VT/VF]). VT/VF after MI is more common in males than females. The mechanisms underlying the decreased vagal tone and the associated sex difference in the occurrence of VT/VF after MI remain elusive. In this study, using optogenetic approaches, we found that responses of glutamatergic vagal afferent neurons were impaired following chronic MI in male mice, leading to reduced reflex efferent parasympathetic function. Molecular analyses of vagal ganglia demonstrated reduced glutamate levels, accompanied by decreased mitochondrial function and impaired redox status in infarcted males versus sham animals. Interestingly, infarcted females demonstrated reduced vagal sensory impairment, associated with greater vagal ganglia glutamate levels and decreased vagal mitochondrial dysfunction and oxidative stress compared with infarcted males. Treatment with 17β-estradiol mitigated this pathological remodeling and improved vagal neurotransmission in infarcted male mice. These data suggest that a decrease in efferent vagal tone following MI results from reduced glutamatergic afferent vagal signaling that may be due to impaired redox homeostasis in the vagal ganglia, which subsequently leads to pathological remodeling in a sex-dependent manner. Importantly, estrogen prevents pathological remodeling and improves parasympathetic function following MI.
Authors
Asokan Devarajan, Kerry Wang, Zulfiqar A. Lokhandwala, Maryam Emamimeybodi, Kassandra Shannon, John D. Tompkins, Andrea L. Hevener, Aldons J. Lusis, E. Dale Abel, Marmar Vaseghi
Usage data is cumulative from December 2024 through December 2025.
| Usage | JCI | PMC |
|---|---|---|
| Text version | 1,042 | 133 |
| 146 | 50 | |
| Figure | 295 | 0 |
| Supplemental data | 116 | 0 |
| Citation downloads | 94 | 0 |
| Totals | 1,693 | 183 |
| Total Views | 1,876 | |
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.
