CD8+ T cells are critical for immune protection against severe COVID-19 during acute infection with SARS-CoV-2. However, the induction of antiviral CD8+ T cell responses varies substantially among infected people, and a better understanding of the mechanisms that underlie such immune heterogeneity is required for pandemic preparedness and risk stratification. In this study, we analyzed SARS-CoV-2–specific CD4+ and CD8+ T cell responses in relation to age, clinical status, and inflammation among patients infected primarily during the initial wave of the pandemic in France or Japan. We found that age-related contraction of the naive lymphocyte pool and systemic inflammation were associated with suboptimal SARS-CoV-2–specific CD4+ and, even more evidently, CD8+ T cell immunity in patients with acute COVID-19. No such differences were observed for humoral immune responses targeting the spike protein of SARS-CoV-2. We also found that the proinflammatory cytokine IL-18, concentrations of which were significantly elevated among patients with severe disease, suppressed the de novo induction and memory recall of antigen-specific CD8+ T cells, including those directed against SARS-CoV-2. These results potentially explain the vulnerability of older adults to infections that elicit a profound inflammatory response, exemplified by acute COVID-19.
Gaëlle Autaa, Laura Papagno, Takuto Nogimori, Andrea Boizard-Moracchini, Daniil Korenkov, Maeva Roy, Koichiro Suzuki, Yuji Masuta, Eoghann White, Sian Llewellyn-Lacey, Yasuo Yoshioka, Francesco Nicoli, David A. Price, Julie Dechanet-Merville, Takuya Yamamoto, Isabelle Pellegrin, Victor Appay
Usage data is cumulative from January 2025 through December 2025.
| Usage | JCI | PMC |
|---|---|---|
| Text version | 2,360 | 150 |
| 704 | 36 | |
| Figure | 433 | 6 |
| Table | 68 | 0 |
| Supplemental data | 200 | 2 |
| Citation downloads | 240 | 0 |
| Totals | 4,005 | 194 |
| Total Views | 4,199 | |
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.