Mucosal melanoma (MucM) is a rare cancer with a poor prognosis and low response rate to immune checkpoint inhibition (ICI) compared with cutaneous melanoma (CM). To explore the immune microenvironment and potential drivers of MucM’s relative resistance to ICI drugs, we characterized 101 MucM tumors (43 head and neck [H&N], 31 female urogenital, 13 male urogenital, 11 anorectal, and 3 other gastrointestinal) using bulk RNA-Seq and immunofluorescence. RNA-Seq data show that MucM has a significantly lower IFN-γ signature levels than CM. MucM tumors of the H&N region show a significantly greater abundance of CD8+ T cells, cytotoxic cells, and higher IFN-γ signature levels than MucM from lower body sites. In the subcohort of 35 patients with MucM treated with ICI, hierarchical clustering reveals clusters with a high and low degree of immune infiltration, with a differential ICI response rate. Immune-associated gene sets were enriched in responders. Signatures associated with cancer-associated fibroblasts, macrophages, and TGF-β signaling may be higher in immune-infiltrated, but ICI-unresponsive tumors, suggesting a role for these resistance mechanisms in MucM. Our data show organ region–specific differences in immune infiltration and IFN-γ signature levels in MucM, with H&N MucM displaying the most favorable immune profile. Our study might offer a starting point for developing more personalized treatment strategies for this disease.
Joris L. Vos, Joleen J.H. Traets, Xiaohang Qiao, Iris M. Seignette, Dennis Peters, Michel W.J.M. Wouters, Erik Hooijberg, Annegien Broeks, Jacqueline E. van der Wal, M. Baris Karakullukcu, W. Martin C. Klop, Arash Navran, Marc van Beurden, Oscar R. Brouwer, Luc G.T. Morris, Mariette I.E. van Poelgeest, Ellen Kapiteijn, John B.A.G. Haanen, Christian U. Blank, Charlotte L. Zuur
Usage data is cumulative from November 2024 through December 2024.
Usage | JCI | PMC |
---|---|---|
Text version | 816 | 7 |
195 | 6 | |
Figure | 92 | 0 |
Table | 48 | 0 |
Supplemental data | 48 | 0 |
Citation downloads | 29 | 0 |
Totals | 1,228 | 13 |
Total Views | 1,241 |
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.