Go to The Journal of Clinical Investigation
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
  • Physician-Scientist Development
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • By specialty
    • COVID-19
    • Cardiology
    • Immunology
    • Metabolism
    • Nephrology
    • Oncology
    • Pulmonology
    • All ...
  • Videos
  • Collections
    • In-Press Preview
    • Resource and Technical Advances
    • Clinical Research and Public Health
    • Research Letters
    • Editorials
    • Perspectives
    • Physician-Scientist Development
    • Reviews
    • Top read articles

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Specialties
  • In-Press Preview
  • Resource and Technical Advances
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Research Letters
  • Editorials
  • Perspectives
  • Physician-Scientist Development
  • Reviews
  • Top read articles
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
Pivotal roles for cancer cell–intrinsic mPGES-1 and autocrine EP4 signaling in suppressing antitumor immunity
Nune Markosyan, Il-Kyu Kim, Charu Arora, Liz Quinones-Ware, Nikhil Joshi, Noah Cheng, Emma Y. Schechter, John W. Tobias, Joseph E. Hochberg, Emily Corse, Kang Liu, Varenka Rodriguez DiBlasi, Li-Chuan (Eric) Chan, Emer M. Smyth, Garret A. FitzGerald, Ben Z. Stanger, Robert H. Vonderheide
Nune Markosyan, Il-Kyu Kim, Charu Arora, Liz Quinones-Ware, Nikhil Joshi, Noah Cheng, Emma Y. Schechter, John W. Tobias, Joseph E. Hochberg, Emily Corse, Kang Liu, Varenka Rodriguez DiBlasi, Li-Chuan (Eric) Chan, Emer M. Smyth, Garret A. FitzGerald, Ben Z. Stanger, Robert H. Vonderheide
View: Text | PDF
Research Article Immunology Oncology

Pivotal roles for cancer cell–intrinsic mPGES-1 and autocrine EP4 signaling in suppressing antitumor immunity

  • Text
  • PDF
Abstract

Tumor cell–derived prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) is a tumor cell–intrinsic factor that supports immunosuppression in the tumor microenvironment (TME) by acting on the immune cells, but the impact of PGE2 signaling in tumor cells on the immunosuppressive TME is unclear. We demonstrate that deleting the PGE2 synthesis enzyme or disrupting autocrine PGE2 signaling through EP4 receptors on tumor cells reverses the T cell–low, myeloid cell–rich TME, activates T cells, and suppresses tumor growth. Knockout (KO) of Ptges (the gene encoding the PGE2 synthesis enzyme mPGES-1) or the EP4 receptor gene (Ptger4) in KPCY (KrasG12D P53R172H Yfp CrePdx) pancreatic tumor cells abolished growth of implanted tumors in a T cell–dependent manner. Blockade of the EP4 receptor in combination with immunotherapy, but not immunotherapy alone, induced complete tumor regressions and immunological memory. Mechanistically, Ptges- and Ptger4-KO tumor cells exhibited altered T and myeloid cell attractant chemokines, became more susceptible to TNF-α–induced killing, and exhibited reduced adenosine synthesis. In hosts treated with an adenosine deaminase inhibitor, Ptger4-KO tumor cells accumulated adenosine and gave rise to tumors. These studies reveal an unexpected finding — a nonredundant role for the autocrine mPGES-1/PGE2/EP4 signaling axis in pancreatic cancer cells, further nominating mPGES-1 inhibition and EP4 blockade as immune-sensitizing therapy in cancer.

Authors

Nune Markosyan, Il-Kyu Kim, Charu Arora, Liz Quinones-Ware, Nikhil Joshi, Noah Cheng, Emma Y. Schechter, John W. Tobias, Joseph E. Hochberg, Emily Corse, Kang Liu, Varenka Rodriguez DiBlasi, Li-Chuan (Eric) Chan, Emer M. Smyth, Garret A. FitzGerald, Ben Z. Stanger, Robert H. Vonderheide

×

Figure 3

Disruption of PGE2 signaling in tumor cells changes the TME through altered production of cytokines, chemokines, and immunosuppressive adenosine.

Options: View larger image (or click on image) Download as PowerPoint
Disruption of PGE2 signaling in tumor cells changes the TME through alte...
(A) Cytokine and chemokine array analysis of media from control (7 pooled samples) and Ptger4-KO (8 pooled samples) tumors cultured ex vivo in hypoxic conditions (average of 2 technical replicates shown). (B) Cytokines from A measured using multiplex bead-based assay in the media of control and Ptger4-KO tumors cultured ex vivo in hypoxic conditions (n = 5–7; in the control group, all data points represent individual tumors and in Ptger4-KO group, 3 data points represent individual tumors and 2 data points represent 2 pooled samples each). (C) Cell viability in vitro assay after 48-hour incubation of the indicated cell lines with indicated concentrations of TNF-α. Cell viability in treatment groups is shown as a percentage of untreated control cells (n = 3/cell line/TNF-α concentration). (D) Proportion of cleaved caspase 3+ (CC3+) tumor cells in Ptger4-KO and control tumors by flow cytometry 11 days after implantation (n = 10). (E) Cell viability in vitro assay after 48-hour incubation of the indicated cell lines with indicated concentrations of TNF-α. Cell viability in treatment groups is shown as a percentage of untreated control cells (n = 3/cell line/TNF-α concentration). (F) Flow cytometric analysis of adenosine synthesis pathway enzymes in EV and Ptger4-KO tumors, 11 days after s.c. implantation (n = 6–10). (G) Flow cytometric analysis of adenosine synthesis pathway enzymes in EV and Ptges-KO tumors, 10 days after s.c. implantation (n = 6–10). (H) Adenosine levels per mg tumor tissue measured by mass spectrometry in media of control EV and Ptger4-KO tumors cultured ex vivo for 24 hours under hypoxic conditions in the presence of 1 μM PGE2 and 10 μM EHNA (adenosine deaminase inhibitor). Combined data from 2 separate experiments shown (n = 11–17). (I) Survival (left) and individual growth curves (right) of s.c. control EV and Ptger4-KO tumors implanted in hosts receiving either vehicle or 0.3 mg/ml EHNA every other day (n = 7). Data are presented as mean ± SEM (A), median (B, D, and F–H), and in I (right), each line represents an individual tumor. Significance was assessed by 2-tailed unpaired Student’s t test (B, D, F–H), global nonlinear regression analysis in GraphPad Prism (C and E), or log-rank Mantel-Cox test (I, left). *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001; ****P < 0.0001.

Copyright © 2026 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN 2379-3708

Sign up for email alerts