Go to The Journal of Clinical Investigation
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
  • Physician-Scientist Development
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • By specialty
    • COVID-19
    • Cardiology
    • Immunology
    • Metabolism
    • Nephrology
    • Oncology
    • Pulmonology
    • All ...
  • Videos
  • Collections
    • In-Press Preview
    • Resource and Technical Advances
    • Clinical Research and Public Health
    • Research Letters
    • Editorials
    • Perspectives
    • Physician-Scientist Development
    • Reviews
    • Top read articles

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Specialties
  • In-Press Preview
  • Resource and Technical Advances
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Research Letters
  • Editorials
  • Perspectives
  • Physician-Scientist Development
  • Reviews
  • Top read articles
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
Targeting ketone body metabolism in mitigating gemcitabine resistance
Krizia Rohena-Rivera, … , Keith Syson Chan, Neil A. Bhowmick
Krizia Rohena-Rivera, … , Keith Syson Chan, Neil A. Bhowmick
Published November 7, 2024
Citation Information: JCI Insight. 2024;9(24):e177840. https://doi.org/10.1172/jci.insight.177840.
View: Text | PDF
Research Article Oncology

Targeting ketone body metabolism in mitigating gemcitabine resistance

  • Text
  • PDF
Abstract

Chemotherapy is often combined with surgery for muscle invasive and nonmuscle invasive bladder cancer (BCa). However, 70% of the patients recur within 5 years. Metabolic reprogramming is an emerging hallmark in cancer chemoresistance. Here, we report a gemcitabine resistance mechanism that promotes cancer reprogramming via the metabolic enzyme OXCT1. This mitochondrial enzyme, responsible for the rate-limiting step in β-hydroxybutyrate (βHB) catabolism, was elevated in muscle invasive disease and in patients with chemoresistant BCa. Resistant orthotopic tumors presented an OXCT1-dependent rise in mitochondrial oxygen consumption rate, ATP, and nucleotide biosynthesis. In resistant BCa, knocking out OXCT1 restored gemcitabine sensitivity, and administering the nonmetabolizable βHB enantiomer (S-βHB) only partially restored gemcitabine sensitivity. Suggesting an extrametabolic role for OXCT1, multi-omics analysis of gemcitabine sensitive and resistant cells revealed an OXCT1-dependent signature with the transcriptional repressor OVOL1 as a master regulator of epithelial differentiation. The elevation of OVOL1 target genes was associated with its cytoplasmic translocation and poor prognosis in a cohort of patients with BCa who have been treated with chemotherapy. The KO of OXCT1 restored OVOL1 transcriptional repressive activity by its nuclear translocation. Orthotopic mouse models of BCa supported OXCT1 as a mediator of gemcitabine sensitivity through ketone metabolism and regulating cancer stem cell differentiation.

Authors

Krizia Rohena-Rivera, Sungyong You, Minhyung Kim, Sandrine Billet, Johanna ten Hoeve, Gabrielle Gonzales, Chengqun Huang, Ashley Heard, Keith Syson Chan, Neil A. Bhowmick

×

Figure 7

Imaging of gemcitabine treatment of orthotopic bladder cancer models.

Options: View larger image (or click on image) Download as PowerPoint
Imaging of gemcitabine treatment of orthotopic bladder cancer models.
(A...
(A) Representative ultrasound images of 5637P, gemcitabine-resistant, and GR-OXCT1KO orthotopic bladder tumors before and after gemcitabine treatment. An outline of the tumor area is depicted in each panel. Scale bar: 1.6 mm. (B) Representative μCT images with iopamidol contrast after gemcitabine treatment. Quantum GX2 microCT (Perkin Elmer) X-Ray kV: 90kV, X-Ray µA 88 µA, FOV: 72 mm, Pixel size: 144 µm. (C) Normalized quantification of tumor volume before and after treatment as measured with ultrasound, 2-way ANOVA at 95 % CI. ****P < 0.0001 (n = 8 per group).

Copyright © 2025 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN 2379-3708

Sign up for email alerts