Go to The Journal of Clinical Investigation
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
  • Physician-Scientist Development
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • By specialty
    • COVID-19
    • Cardiology
    • Immunology
    • Metabolism
    • Nephrology
    • Oncology
    • Pulmonology
    • All ...
  • Videos
  • Collections
    • In-Press Preview
    • Resource and Technical Advances
    • Clinical Research and Public Health
    • Research Letters
    • Editorials
    • Perspectives
    • Physician-Scientist Development
    • Reviews
    • Top read articles

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Specialties
  • In-Press Preview
  • Resource and Technical Advances
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Research Letters
  • Editorials
  • Perspectives
  • Physician-Scientist Development
  • Reviews
  • Top read articles
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
Pharmacological induction of MHC-I expression in tumor cells revitalizes T cell antitumor immunity
Qian Yu, … , Yongjun Dang, Wei Jiang
Qian Yu, … , Yongjun Dang, Wei Jiang
Published August 6, 2024
Citation Information: JCI Insight. 2024;9(17):e177788. https://doi.org/10.1172/jci.insight.177788.
View: Text | PDF
Research Article Oncology

Pharmacological induction of MHC-I expression in tumor cells revitalizes T cell antitumor immunity

  • Text
  • PDF
Abstract

Antigen presentation by major histocompatibility complex class I (MHC-I) is crucial for T cell–mediated killing, and aberrant surface MHC-I expression is tightly associated with immune evasion. To address MHC-I downregulation, we conducted a high-throughput flow cytometry screen, identifying bleomycin (BLM) as a potent inducer of cell surface MHC-I expression. BLM-induced MHC-I augmentation rendered tumor cells more susceptible to T cells in coculture assays and enhanced antitumor responses in an adoptive cellular transfer mouse model. Mechanistically, BLM remodeled the tumor immune microenvironment, inducing MHC-I expression in a manner dependent on ataxia-telangiectasia mutated/ataxia telangiectasia and Rad3-related–NF-κB. Furthermore, BLM improved T cell–dependent immunotherapeutic approaches, including bispecific antibody therapy, immune checkpoint therapy, and autologous tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte therapy. Importantly, low-dose BLM treatment in mouse models amplified the antitumor effect of immunotherapy without detectable pulmonary toxicity. In summary, our findings repurpose BLM as a potential inducer of MHC-I, enhancing its expression to improve the efficacy of T cell–based immunotherapy.

Authors

Qian Yu, Yu Dong, Xiaobo Wang, Chenxuan Su, Runkai Zhang, Wei Xu, Shuai Jiang, Yongjun Dang, Wei Jiang

×

Figure 6

DNA methyltransferase inhibition promotes BLM-induced antitumor immune responses.

Options: View larger image (or click on image) Download as PowerPoint
DNA methyltransferase inhibition promotes BLM-induced antitumor immune r...
(A) Top panel: Growth inhibition as detected by cell viability of SK-BR-3 cells treated with mock/100 nM decitabine (DAC) for 5 days and BLM for 2 days. Bottom panel: Combination index (CI) plots. (B) B16OVA cells pretreated with 100 nM DAC for 5 days were trypsinized and plated in 12-well plates with equal numbers of viable cells. Cells were then treated with BLM (0.5 μM) for 1 day prior to coculture with OT-I T cells. The first lane displays the crystal violet staining images (scale bars, 400 μm). The second lane presents the representative images of cancer cells’ apoptosis after coculture with OT-I T cells. (C) Quantification of the percentages of early and late apoptotic cells among cancer cells from B; n = 3 per group. (D–F) Treatment of B16F10 tumors with DNA methyltransferase inhibitor (DAC) or vehicle control in combination with BLM or vehicle control; n = 6 per group. Mouse weight (D), tumor volume (E) and tumor weight (F); n = 6 per group. Data are shown as mean ± SD. *P < 0.05, ***P < 0.001, compared with the vehicle group by 1-way ANOVA (E and F) and unpaired t test (C); #P < 0.05, ##P < 0.01, and ###P < 0.001 between the indicated groups by unpaired t test (E and F).

Copyright © 2025 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN 2379-3708

Sign up for email alerts