Usage Information
Abstract
Dual endothelin-1 (ET-1) and angiotensin II (AngII) receptor antagonism with sparsentan has strong antiproteinuric actions via multiple potential mechanisms that are more pronounced, or additive, compared with current standard of care using angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs). Considering the many actions of ET-1 and AngII on multiple cell types, this study aimed to determine glomeruloprotective mechanisms of sparsentan compared to the ARB losartan by direct visualization of its effects in the intact kidney in focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS) using intravital multiphoton microscopy. In both healthy and FSGS models, sparsentan treatment increased afferent/efferent arteriole diameters; increased or preserved blood flow and single-nephron glomerular filtration rate; attenuated acute ET-1 and AngII–induced increases in podocyte calcium; reduced proteinuria; preserved podocyte number; increased both endothelial and renin lineage cells and clones in vasculature, glomeruli, and tubules; restored glomerular endothelial glycocalyx; and attenuated mitochondrial stress and immune cell homing. These effects were either not observed or of smaller magnitude with losartan. The pleiotropic nephroprotective effects of sparsentan included improved hemodynamics, podocyte and endothelial cell functions, and tissue repair. Compared with losartan, sparsentan was more effective in the sustained preservation of kidney structure and function, which underscores the importance of the ET-1 component in FSGS pathogenesis and therapy.
Authors
Georgina Gyarmati, Urvi Nikhil Shroff, Audrey Izuhara, Sachin Deepak, Radko Komers, Patricia W. Bedard, Janos Peti-Peterdi
Usage data is cumulative from March 2025 through March 2026.
| Usage | JCI | PMC |
|---|---|---|
| Text version | 2,785 | 388 |
| 321 | 80 | |
| Figure | 570 | 1 |
| Supplemental data | 166 | 9 |
| Citation downloads | 152 | 0 |
| Totals | 3,994 | 478 |
| Total Views | 4,472 | |
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.
