Solid organ transplantation remains the life-saving treatment for end-stage organ failure, but chronic rejection remains a major obstacle to long-term allograft outcomes and has not improved substantially. Tertiary lymphoid organs (TLO) are ectopic lymphoid structures that form under conditions of chronic inflammation, and evidence from human transplantation suggests that TLO regularly form in allografts undergoing chronic rejection. In this study, we utilized a mouse renal transplantation model and manipulation of the lymphotoxin alpha (LTα) – lymphotoxin beta receptor (LTβR) pathway, which is essential for TLO formation, to define the role of TLO in transplantation. We showed that intragraft TLO are sufficient to activate the alloimmune response and mediate graft rejection in a model where the only lymphoid organs are TLO in the allograft. When transplanted to recipients with a normal set of secondary lymphoid organs, the presence of graft TLO or LTα overexpression accelerated rejection. If the LTβR pathway was disrupted in the donor graft, TLO formation was abrogated, and graft survival prolonged. Intravital microscopy of renal TLO demonstrated that local T and B cell activation in TLOs is similar to that observed in secondary lymphoid organs. In summary, we demonstrated that immune activation in TLO contributes to local immune responses, leading to earlier allograft failure. TLO and the LTαβ-LTβR pathway are therefore prime targets to limit local immune responses and prevent allograft rejection. These findings are applicable to other diseases such as autoimmunity or tumors, where either limiting or boosting local immune responses is beneficial and improves disease outcomes.
Gang Zhang, Neda Feizi, Daqiang Zhao, Latha Halesha, Amanda L. Williams, Parmjeet S. Randhawa, Khodor I. Abou-Daya, Martin H. Oberbarnscheidt
Usage data is cumulative from July 2024 through July 2024.
Usage | JCI | PMC |
---|---|---|
Text version | 284 | 0 |
83 | 0 | |
Supplemental data | 43 | 0 |
Citation downloads | 7 | 0 |
Totals | 417 | 0 |
Total Views | 417 |
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.