Usage Information
Citation Information: JCI Insight. 2024;9(5):e176556. https://doi.org/10.1172/jci.insight.176556.
Abstract
Understanding the immune responses to SARS-CoV-2 vaccination is critical to optimizing vaccination strategies for individuals with autoimmune diseases, such as systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Here, we comprehensively analyzed innate and adaptive immune responses in 19 patients with SLE receiving a complete 2-dose Pfizer-BioNTech mRNA vaccine (BNT162b2) regimen compared with a control cohort of 56 healthy control (HC) volunteers. Patients with SLE exhibited impaired neutralizing antibody production and antigen-specific CD4+ and CD8+ T cell responses relative to HC. Interestingly, antibody responses were only altered in patients with SLE treated with immunosuppressive therapies, whereas impairment of antigen-specific CD4+ and CD8+ T cell numbers was independent of medication. Patients with SLE also displayed reduced levels of circulating CXC motif chemokine ligands, CXCL9, CXCL10, CXCL11, and IFN-γ after secondary vaccination as well as downregulation of gene expression pathways indicative of compromised innate immune responses. Single-cell RNA-Seq analysis reveals that patients with SLE showed reduced levels of a vaccine-inducible monocyte population characterized by overexpression of IFN-response transcription factors. Thus, although 2 doses of BNT162b2 induced relatively robust immune responses in patients with SLE, our data demonstrate impairment of both innate and adaptive immune responses relative to HC, highlighting a need for population-specific vaccination studies.
Authors
Kavita Y. Sarin, Hong Zheng, Yashaar Chaichian, Prabhu S. Arunachalam, Gayathri Swaminathan, Alec Eschholz, Fei Gao, Oliver F. Wirz, Brandon Lam, Emily Yang, Lori W. Lee, Allan Feng, Matthew A. Lewis, Janice Lin, Holden T. Maecker, Scott D. Boyd, Mark M. Davis, Kari C. Nadeau, Bali Pulendran, Purvesh Khatri, Paul J. Utz, Lisa C. Zaba
Usage data is cumulative from March 2024 through December 2024.
| Usage | JCI | PMC |
|---|---|---|
| Text version | 2,080 | 433 |
| 365 | 125 | |
| Figure | 470 | 7 |
| Table | 43 | 0 |
| Supplemental data | 135 | 17 |
| Citation downloads | 105 | 0 |
| Totals | 3,198 | 582 |
| Total Views | 3,780 | |
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.
