Go to The Journal of Clinical Investigation
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
  • Physician-Scientist Development
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • By specialty
    • COVID-19
    • Cardiology
    • Immunology
    • Metabolism
    • Nephrology
    • Oncology
    • Pulmonology
    • All ...
  • Videos
  • Collections
    • In-Press Preview
    • Resource and Technical Advances
    • Clinical Research and Public Health
    • Research Letters
    • Editorials
    • Perspectives
    • Physician-Scientist Development
    • Reviews
    • Top read articles

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Specialties
  • In-Press Preview
  • Resource and Technical Advances
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Research Letters
  • Editorials
  • Perspectives
  • Physician-Scientist Development
  • Reviews
  • Top read articles
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
Impaired innate and adaptive immune responses to BNT162b2 SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in systemic lupus erythematosus
Kavita Y. Sarin, … , Paul J. Utz, Lisa C. Zaba
Kavita Y. Sarin, … , Paul J. Utz, Lisa C. Zaba
Published March 8, 2024
Citation Information: JCI Insight. 2024;9(5):e176556. https://doi.org/10.1172/jci.insight.176556.
View: Text | PDF
Research Article Vaccines

Impaired innate and adaptive immune responses to BNT162b2 SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in systemic lupus erythematosus

  • Text
  • PDF
Abstract

Understanding the immune responses to SARS-CoV-2 vaccination is critical to optimizing vaccination strategies for individuals with autoimmune diseases, such as systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Here, we comprehensively analyzed innate and adaptive immune responses in 19 patients with SLE receiving a complete 2-dose Pfizer-BioNTech mRNA vaccine (BNT162b2) regimen compared with a control cohort of 56 healthy control (HC) volunteers. Patients with SLE exhibited impaired neutralizing antibody production and antigen-specific CD4+ and CD8+ T cell responses relative to HC. Interestingly, antibody responses were only altered in patients with SLE treated with immunosuppressive therapies, whereas impairment of antigen-specific CD4+ and CD8+ T cell numbers was independent of medication. Patients with SLE also displayed reduced levels of circulating CXC motif chemokine ligands, CXCL9, CXCL10, CXCL11, and IFN-γ after secondary vaccination as well as downregulation of gene expression pathways indicative of compromised innate immune responses. Single-cell RNA-Seq analysis reveals that patients with SLE showed reduced levels of a vaccine-inducible monocyte population characterized by overexpression of IFN-response transcription factors. Thus, although 2 doses of BNT162b2 induced relatively robust immune responses in patients with SLE, our data demonstrate impairment of both innate and adaptive immune responses relative to HC, highlighting a need for population-specific vaccination studies.

Authors

Kavita Y. Sarin, Hong Zheng, Yashaar Chaichian, Prabhu S. Arunachalam, Gayathri Swaminathan, Alec Eschholz, Fei Gao, Oliver F. Wirz, Brandon Lam, Emily Yang, Lori W. Lee, Allan Feng, Matthew A. Lewis, Janice Lin, Holden T. Maecker, Scott D. Boyd, Mark M. Davis, Kari C. Nadeau, Bali Pulendran, Purvesh Khatri, Paul J. Utz, Lisa C. Zaba

×

Figure 4

Temporal changes in whole blood transcriptional profiles of patients with SLE after BNT162b2 vaccination.

Options: View larger image (or click on image) Download as PowerPoint
Temporal changes in whole blood transcriptional profiles of patients wit...
(A) Gene set enrichment analysis of blood transcriptome modules (BTMs) enriched at each time point compared with baseline (day 0). The BTM terms with FDR less than 5% were shown as circles. NES, normalized enrichment score. (B) Gene set enrichment of SLE vaccine responders (SLE-R) compared with healthy controls (HC), SLE vaccine nonresponders (SLE-NR) compared with HC, and SLE-NR compared with SLE-R. The BTM terms with FDR less than 5% were shown as circles. (C) ISG score for each cohort across time points. The P values for day 0 (SLE-NR, n = 7; SLE-R, n = 11; HC:,n = 31) and day 28 (SLE-NR, n = 7; SLE-R, n = 11; HC, n = 30) were calculated using 1-sided Wilcoxon rank-sum test.

Copyright © 2025 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN 2379-3708

Sign up for email alerts