Go to The Journal of Clinical Investigation
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
  • Physician-Scientist Development
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • By specialty
    • COVID-19
    • Cardiology
    • Immunology
    • Metabolism
    • Nephrology
    • Oncology
    • Pulmonology
    • All ...
  • Videos
  • Collections
    • In-Press Preview
    • Resource and Technical Advances
    • Clinical Research and Public Health
    • Research Letters
    • Editorials
    • Perspectives
    • Physician-Scientist Development
    • Reviews
    • Top read articles

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Specialties
  • In-Press Preview
  • Resource and Technical Advances
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Research Letters
  • Editorials
  • Perspectives
  • Physician-Scientist Development
  • Reviews
  • Top read articles
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
Immunoglobulin replacement products protect against SARS-CoV-2 infection in vivo despite poor neutralizing activity
Ofer Zimmerman, … , Ali H. Ellebedy, Michael S. Diamond
Ofer Zimmerman, … , Ali H. Ellebedy, Michael S. Diamond
Published January 4, 2024
Citation Information: JCI Insight. 2024;9(3):e176359. https://doi.org/10.1172/jci.insight.176359.
View: Text | PDF
Research Article COVID-19 Immunology

Immunoglobulin replacement products protect against SARS-CoV-2 infection in vivo despite poor neutralizing activity

  • Text
  • PDF
Abstract

Immunoglobulin (IG) replacement products are used routinely in patients with immune deficiency and other immune dysregulation disorders who have poor responses to vaccination and require passive immunity conferred by commercial antibody products. The binding, neutralizing, and protective activity of intravenously administered IG against SARS-CoV-2 emerging variants remains unknown. Here, we tested 198 different IG products manufactured from December 2019 to August 2022. We show that prepandemic IG had no appreciable cross-reactivity or neutralizing activity against SARS-CoV-2. Anti-spike antibody titers and neutralizing activity against SARS-CoV-2 WA1/2020 D614G increased gradually after the pandemic started and reached levels comparable to vaccinated healthy donors 18 months after the diagnosis of the first COVID-19 case in the United States in January 2020. The average time between production to infusion of IG products was 8 months, which resulted in poor neutralization of the variant strain circulating at the time of infusion. Despite limited neutralizing activity, IG prophylaxis with clinically relevant dosing protected susceptible K18-hACE2–transgenic mice against clinical disease, lung infection, and lung inflammation caused by the XBB.1.5 Omicron variant. Moreover, following IG prophylaxis, levels of XBB.1.5 infection in the lung were higher in FcγR-KO mice than in WT mice. Thus, IG replacement products with poor neutralizing activity against evolving SARS-CoV-2 variants likely confer protection to patients with immune deficiency disorders through Fc effector function mechanisms.

Authors

Ofer Zimmerman, Alexa Michelle Altman Doss, Baoling Ying, Chieh-Yu Liang, Samantha R. Mackin, Hannah G. Davis-Adams, Lucas J. Adams, Laura A. VanBlargan, Rita E. Chen, Suzanne M. Scheaffer, Pritesh Desai, Saravanan Raju, Tarisa L. Mantia, Caitlin C. O’Shaughnessy, Jennifer Marie Monroy, H. James Wedner, Christopher J. Rigell, Andrew L. Kau, Tiffany Biason Dy, Zhen Ren, Jackson S. Turner, Jane A. O’Halloran, Rachel M. Presti, Peggy L. Kendall, Daved H. Fremont, Ali H. Ellebedy, Michael S. Diamond

×

Figure 5

The reduction in XBB.1.5 lung infection following IG prophylaxis is Fc effector function dependent.

Options: View larger image (or click on image) Download as PowerPoint
The reduction in XBB.1.5 lung infection following IG prophylaxis is Fc e...
(A and B) Levels of XBB.1.5 RNA (A) and infectious virus (B) in the lungs of C57BL/6J (n = 10, black dots) and FcγR I/III/IV–KO mice (n = 10, red dots) challenged with SARS-CoV-2 XBB.1.5, 24 hours following administration of PBS or IG prophylaxis. Lungs were collected 2 days after inoculation for virological analysis. Mean values are shown (2 experiments). ****P < 0.0001 by 1-way ANOVA with Tukey’s posttest correction (A and B).

Copyright © 2025 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN 2379-3708

Sign up for email alerts