Usage Information
Citation Information: JCI Insight. 2024;9(7):e175375. https://doi.org/10.1172/jci.insight.175375.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Broadly neutralizing monoclonal antibodies (bNAbs) represent a promising strategy for HIV-1 immunoprophylaxis and treatment. 10E8VLS and VRC07-523LS are bNAbs that target the highly conserved membrane-proximal external region (MPER) and the CD4-binding site of the HIV-1 viral envelope glycoprotein, respectively.METHODS In this phase 1, open-label trial, we evaluated the safety and pharmacokinetics of 5 mg/kg 10E8VLS administered alone, or concurrently with 5 mg/kg VRC07-523LS, via s.c. injection to healthy non–HIV-infected individuals.RESULTS Eight participants received either 10E8VLS alone (n = 6) or 10E8VLS and VRC07-523LS in combination (n = 2). Five (n = 5 of 8, 62.5%) participants who received 10E8VLS experienced moderate local reactogenicity, and 1 participant (n = 1/8, 12.5%) experienced severe local reactogenicity. Further trial enrollment was stopped, and no participant received repeat dosing. All local reactogenicity resolved without sequelae. 10E8VLS retained its neutralizing capacity, and no functional anti-drug antibodies were detected; however, a serum t1/2 of 8.1 days was shorter than expected. Therefore, the trial was voluntarily stopped per sponsor decision (Vaccine Research Center, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases [NIAID], NIH). Mechanistic studies performed to investigate the underlying reason for the reactogenicity suggest that multiple mechanisms may have contributed, including antibody aggregation and upregulation of local inflammatory markers.CONCLUSION 10E8VLS resulted in unexpected reactogenicity and a shorter t1/2 in comparison with previously tested bNAbs. These studies may facilitate identification of nonreactogenic second-generation MPER-targeting bNAbs, which could be an effective strategy for HIV-1 immunoprophylaxis and treatment.TRIAL REGISTRATION Clinicaltrials.gov, accession no. NCT03565315.FUNDING Division of Intramural Research, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, NIH.
Authors
Seemal F. Awan, Amarendra Pegu, Larisa Strom, Cristina A. Carter, Cynthia S. Hendel, LaSonji A. Holman, Pamela J. Costner, Olga Trofymenko, Renunda Dyer, Ingelise J. Gordon, Ro Shauna S. Rothwell, Somia P. Hickman, Michelle Conan-Cibotti, Nicole A. Doria-Rose, Bob C. Lin, Sarah O’Connell, Sandeep R. Narpala, Cassandra G. Almasri, Cuiping Liu, Sungyoul Ko, Young D. Kwon, Aryan M. Namboodiri, Janardan P. Pandey, Frank J. Arnold, Kevin Carlton, Jason G. Gall, Peter D. Kwong, Edmund V. Capparelli, Robert T. Bailer, Adrian B. McDermott, Grace L. Chen, Richard A. Koup, John R. Mascola, Emily E. Coates, Julie E. Ledgerwood, Martin R. Gaudinski, the VRC 610 study team
Usage data is cumulative from April 2024 through January 2025.
| Usage | JCI | PMC |
|---|---|---|
| Text version | 1,934 | 215 |
| 315 | 64 | |
| Figure | 379 | 1 |
| Table | 42 | 0 |
| Supplemental data | 154 | 8 |
| Citation downloads | 94 | 0 |
| Totals | 2,918 | 288 |
| Total Views | 3,206 | |
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.
