Go to The Journal of Clinical Investigation
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
  • Physician-Scientist Development
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • By specialty
    • COVID-19
    • Cardiology
    • Immunology
    • Metabolism
    • Nephrology
    • Oncology
    • Pulmonology
    • All ...
  • Videos
  • Collections
    • In-Press Preview
    • Resource and Technical Advances
    • Clinical Research and Public Health
    • Research Letters
    • Editorials
    • Perspectives
    • Physician-Scientist Development
    • Reviews
    • Top read articles

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Specialties
  • In-Press Preview
  • Resource and Technical Advances
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Research Letters
  • Editorials
  • Perspectives
  • Physician-Scientist Development
  • Reviews
  • Top read articles
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
Toxin-neutralizing Abs are associated with improved T cell function following recovery from Staphylococcus aureus infection
Maureen Kleinhenz, … , Robin Alexander, Christopher P. Montgomery
Maureen Kleinhenz, … , Robin Alexander, Christopher P. Montgomery
Published January 18, 2024
Citation Information: JCI Insight. 2024;9(4):e173526. https://doi.org/10.1172/jci.insight.173526.
View: Text | PDF
Clinical Research and Public Health Immunology Infectious disease

Toxin-neutralizing Abs are associated with improved T cell function following recovery from Staphylococcus aureus infection

  • Text
  • PDF
Abstract

BACKGROUND T cell responses are impaired in Staphylococcus aureus–infected children, highlighting a potential mechanism of immune evasion. This study tested the hypotheses that toxin-specific antibodies protect immune cells from bacterial killing and are associated with improved T cell function following infection.METHODS S. aureus–infected and healthy children (N = 33 each) were prospectively enrolled. During acute infection and convalescence, we quantified toxin-specific IgG levels by ELISA, antibody function using a cell killing assay, and functional T cell responses by ELISPOT.RESULTS There were no differences in toxin-specific IgG levels or ability to neutralize toxin-mediated immune cell killing between healthy and acutely infected children, but antibody levels and function increased following infection. Similarly, T cell function, which was impaired during acute infection, improved following infection. However, the response to infection was highly variable; up to half of children did not have improved antibody or T cell function. Serum from children with higher α-hemolysin–specific IgG levels more strongly protected immune cells against toxin-mediated killing. Importantly, children whose serum more strongly protected against toxin-mediated killing also had stronger immune responses to infection, characterized by more elicited antibodies and greater improvement in T cell function following infection.CONCLUSION This study demonstrates that, despite T cell impairment during acute infection, S. aureus elicits toxin-neutralizing antibodies. Individual antibody responses and T cell recovery are variable. These findings also suggest that toxin-neutralizing antibodies protect antigen-presenting cells and T cells, thereby promoting immune recovery. Finally, failure to elicit toxin-neutralizing antibodies may identify children at risk for prolonged T cell suppression.FUNDING NIH National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases R01AI125489 and Nationwide Children’s Hospital.

Authors

Maureen Kleinhenz, Zhaotao Li, Usha Chidella, Walissa Picard, Amber Wolfe, Jill Popelka, Robin Alexander, Christopher P. Montgomery

×
Problems with a PDF?

This file is in Adobe Acrobat (PDF) format. If you have not installed and configured the Adobe Acrobat Reader on your system.

Having trouble reading a PDF?

PDFs are designed to be printed out and read, but if you prefer to read them online, you may find it easier if you increase the view size to 125%.

Having trouble saving a PDF?

Many versions of the free Acrobat Reader do not allow Save. You must instead save the PDF from the JCI Online page you downloaded it from. PC users: Right-click on the Download link and choose the option that says something like "Save Link As...". Mac users should hold the mouse button down on the link to get these same options.

Having trouble printing a PDF?

  1. Try printing one page at a time or to a newer printer.
  2. Try saving the file to disk before printing rather than opening it "on the fly." This requires that you configure your browser to "Save" rather than "Launch Application" for the file type "application/pdf", and can usually be done in the "Helper Applications" options.
  3. Make sure you are using the latest version of Adobe's Acrobat Reader.

ICMJE disclosure forms - Download (535.03 KB)

Advertisement

Copyright © 2025 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN 2379-3708

Sign up for email alerts