Go to The Journal of Clinical Investigation
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
  • Physician-Scientist Development
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • By specialty
    • COVID-19
    • Cardiology
    • Immunology
    • Metabolism
    • Nephrology
    • Oncology
    • Pulmonology
    • All ...
  • Videos
  • Collections
    • In-Press Preview
    • Resource and Technical Advances
    • Clinical Research and Public Health
    • Research Letters
    • Editorials
    • Perspectives
    • Physician-Scientist Development
    • Reviews
    • Top read articles

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Specialties
  • In-Press Preview
  • Resource and Technical Advances
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Research Letters
  • Editorials
  • Perspectives
  • Physician-Scientist Development
  • Reviews
  • Top read articles
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
Calorie restriction outperforms bariatric surgery in a murine model of obesity and triple-negative breast cancer
Kristina K. Camp, … , Randy J. Seeley, Stephen D. Hursting
Kristina K. Camp, … , Randy J. Seeley, Stephen D. Hursting
Published September 12, 2023
Citation Information: JCI Insight. 2023;8(19):e172868. https://doi.org/10.1172/jci.insight.172868.
View: Text | PDF
Research Article Metabolism Oncology

Calorie restriction outperforms bariatric surgery in a murine model of obesity and triple-negative breast cancer

  • Text
  • PDF
Abstract

Obesity promotes triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), and effective interventions are urgently needed to break the obesity-TNBC link. Epidemiologic studies indicate that bariatric surgery reduces TNBC risk, while evidence is limited or conflicted for weight loss via low-fat diet (LFD) or calorie restriction (CR). Using a murine model of obesity-driven TNBC, we compared the antitumor effects of vertical sleeve gastrectomy (VSG) with LFD, chronic CR, and intermittent CR. Each intervention generated weight and fat loss and suppressed tumor growth relative to obese mice (greatest suppression with CR). VSG and CR regimens exerted both similar and unique effects, as assessed using multiomics approaches, in reversing obesity-associated transcript, epigenetics, secretome, and microbiota changes and restoring antitumor immunity. Thus, in a murine model of TNBC, bariatric surgery and CR each reverse obesity-driven tumor growth via shared and distinct antitumor mechanisms, and CR is superior to VSG in reversing obesity’s procancer effects.

Authors

Kristina K. Camp, Michael F. Coleman, Tori L. McFarlane, Steven S. Doerstling, Subreen A. Khatib, Erika T. Rezeli, Alfor G. Lewis, Alexander J. Pfeil, Laura A. Smith, Laura W. Bowers, Farnaz Fouladi, Weida Gong, Elaine M. Glenny, Joel S. Parker, Ginger L. Milne, Ian M. Carroll, Anthony A. Fodor, Randy J. Seeley, Stephen D. Hursting

×

Figure 1

Dietary and surgical weight loss blunt obesity-driven tumor growth.

Options: View larger image (or click on image) Download as PowerPoint
Dietary and surgical weight loss blunt obesity-driven tumor growth.
(A) ...
(A) Schematic of study design. CON, control; DIO, diet-induced obesity; HFD, high-fat diet; LFD, low-fat diet; VSG, vertical sleeve gastrectomy. (B) Body mass prior to weight loss interventions. (C) Change in body weight over time following weight-loss interventions. (D) Body mass prior to tumor cell injection. (E) Terminal body mass. (F) Ex vivo tumor mass. (G and H) Body composition following weight loss interventions. (I) Mediation analysis of weight change following weight loss intervention on tumor mass. (J) Hallmark gene sets determined significant by GSEA of tumor transcriptomics in pairwise comparisons with DIO-HFD. Gene sets grouped and colored as immune, other, and signaling related. (B–F and I) n = 21 CON-LFD, 21 DIO-HFD, 24 DIO-VSG, 19 DIO-LFD. (G and H) n = 8 CON-LFD, 8 DIO-HFD, 9 DIO-VSG, 8 DIO-LFD. (J) n = 6 CON-LFD, 6 DIO-HFD, 6 DIO-VSG, 5 DIO-LFD. (B–H) One-way ANOVA with Tukey’s post hoc test. NES, normalized enrichment score.

Copyright © 2025 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN 2379-3708

Sign up for email alerts