BACKGROUND The locus coeruleus (LC) is the primary source of norepinephrine in the brain and regulates arousal and sleep. Animal research shows that it plays important roles in the transition between sleep and wakefulness, and between slow wave sleep and rapid eye movement sleep (REMS). It is unclear, however, whether the activity of the LC predicts sleep variability in humans.METHODS We used 7-Tesla functional MRI, sleep electroencephalography (EEG), and a sleep questionnaire to test whether the LC activity during wakefulness was associated with sleep quality in 33 healthy younger (~22 years old; 28 women, 5 men) and 19 older (~61 years old; 14 women, 5 men) individuals.RESULTS We found that, in older but not in younger participants, higher LC activity, as probed during an auditory attentional task, was associated with worse subjective sleep quality and with lower power over the EEG theta band during REMS. The results remained robust even when accounting for the age-related changes in the integrity of the LC.CONCLUSION These findings suggest that LC activity correlates with the perception of the sleep quality and an essential oscillatory mode of REMS, and we found that the LC may be an important target in the treatment of sleep- and age-related diseases.FUNDING This work was supported by Fonds National de la Recherche Scientifique (FRS-FNRS, T.0242.19 & J. 0222.20), Action de Recherche Concertée – Fédération Wallonie-Bruxelles (ARC SLEEPDEM 17/27-09), Fondation Recherche Alzheimer (SAO-FRA 2019/0025), ULiège, and European Regional Development Fund (Radiomed & Biomed-Hub).
Ekaterina Koshmanova, Alexandre Berger, Elise Beckers, Islay Campbell, Nasrin Mortazavi, Roya Sharifpour, Ilenia Paparella, Fermin Balda, Christian Berthomier, Christian Degueldre, Eric Salmon, Laurent Lamalle, Christine Bastin, Maxime Van Egroo, Christophe Phillips, Pierre Maquet, Fabienne Collette, Vincenzo Muto, Daphne Chylinski, Heidi I.L. Jacobs, Puneet Talwar, Siya Sherif, Gilles Vandewalle
Usage data is cumulative from September 2023 through August 2024.
Usage | JCI | PMC |
---|---|---|
Text version | 2,343 | 474 |
491 | 86 | |
Figure | 174 | 12 |
Table | 63 | 0 |
Supplemental data | 41 | 2 |
Citation downloads | 75 | 0 |
Totals | 3,187 | 574 |
Total Views | 3,761 |
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.