Neutrophilia occurs in patients infected with SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) and is predictive of poor outcomes. Here, we link heterogenous neutrophil populations to disease severity in COVID-19. We identified neutrophils with features of cellular aging and immunosuppressive capacity in mild COVID-19 and features of neutrophil immaturity and activation in severe disease. The low-density neutrophil (LDN) number in circulating blood correlated with COVID-19 severity. Many of the divergent neutrophil phenotypes in COVID-19 were overrepresented in the LDN fraction and were less detectable in normal-density neutrophils. Functionally, neutrophils from patients with severe COVID-19 displayed defects in neutrophil extracellular trap formation and reactive oxygen species production. Soluble factors secreted by neutrophils from these patients inhibited T cell proliferation. Neutrophils from patients with severe COVID-19 had increased expression of arginase-1 protein, a feature that was retained in convalescent patients. Despite this increase in intracellular expression, there was a reduction in arginase-1 release by neutrophils into serum and culture supernatants. Furthermore, neutrophil-mediated T cell suppression was independent of arginase-1. Our results indicate the presence of dysfunctional, activated, and immature neutrophils in severe COVID-19.
Amrita Dwivedi, Aisling Ui Mhaonaigh, Makala Carroll, Bahareh Khosravi, Isabella Batten, Robert Seán Ballantine, Stuart Hendricken Phelan, Laura O’Doherty, Angel Mary George, Jacklyn Sui, Heike C. Hawerkamp, Padraic G. Fallon, Elnè Noppe, Sabina Mason, Niall Conlon, Clíona Ni Cheallaigh, Conor M. Finlay, Mark A. Little, Bioresource on behalf of the St James’s and Tallaght Trinity Allied Researchers (STTAR)
Usage data is cumulative from September 2024 through December 2024.
Usage | JCI | PMC |
---|---|---|
Text version | 1,245 | 119 |
330 | 32 | |
Figure | 238 | 11 |
Table | 45 | 0 |
Supplemental data | 66 | 1 |
Citation downloads | 58 | 0 |
Totals | 1,982 | 163 |
Total Views | 2,145 |
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.