Usage Information
Citation Information: JCI Insight. 2023;8(16):e168102. https://doi.org/10.1172/jci.insight.168102.
Abstract
BACKGROUND While B cell depletion is associated with attenuated antibody responses to SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccination, responses vary among individuals. Thus, elucidating the factors that affect immune responses after repeated vaccination is an important clinical need.METHODS We evaluated the quality and magnitude of the T cell, B cell, antibody, and cytokine responses to a third dose of BNT162b2 or mRNA-1273 mRNA vaccine in patients with B cell depletion.RESULTS In contrast with control individuals (n = 10), most patients on anti-CD20 therapy (n = 48) did not demonstrate an increase in spike-specific B cells or antibodies after a third dose of vaccine. A third vaccine elicited significantly increased frequencies of spike-specific non-naive T cells. A small subset of B cell–depleted individuals effectively produced spike-specific antibodies, and logistic regression models identified time since last anti-CD20 treatment and lower cumulative exposure to anti-CD20 mAbs as predictors of those having a serologic response. B cell–depleted patients who mounted an antibody response to 3 vaccine doses had persistent humoral immunity 6 months later.CONCLUSION These results demonstrate that serial vaccination strategies can be effective for a subset of B cell–depleted patients.FUNDING The NIH (R25 NS079193, P01 AI073748, U24 AI11867, R01 AI22220, UM 1HG009390, P01 AI039671, P50 CA121974, R01 CA227473, U01CA260507, 75N93019C00065, K24 AG042489), NIH HIPC Consortium (U19 AI089992), the National Multiple Sclerosis Society (CA 1061-A-18, RG-1802-30153), the Nancy Taylor Foundation for Chronic Diseases, Erase MS, the Robert Leet and Clara Guthrie Patterson Trust, and the Claude D. Pepper Older Americans Independence Center at Yale (P30 AG21342).
Authors
Hiromitsu Asashima, Dongjoo Kim, Kaicheng Wang, Nikhil Lele, Nicholas C. Buitrago-Pocasangre, Rachel Lutz, Isabella Cruz, Khadir Raddassi, William E. Ruff, Michael K. Racke, JoDell E. Wilson, Tara S. Givens, Alba Grifoni, Daniela Weiskopf, Alessandro Sette, Steven H. Kleinstein, Ruth R. Montgomery, Albert C. Shaw, Fangyong Li, Rong Fan, David A. Hafler, Mary M. Tomayko, Erin E. Longbrake
Usage data is cumulative from February 2024 through February 2025.
| Usage | JCI | PMC |
|---|---|---|
| Text version | 767 | 272 |
| 141 | 61 | |
| Figure | 132 | 2 |
| Table | 89 | 0 |
| Supplemental data | 123 | 13 |
| Citation downloads | 51 | 0 |
| Totals | 1,303 | 348 |
| Total Views | 1,651 | |
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.
