Go to The Journal of Clinical Investigation
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
  • Physician-Scientist Development
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • By specialty
    • COVID-19
    • Cardiology
    • Immunology
    • Metabolism
    • Nephrology
    • Oncology
    • Pulmonology
    • All ...
  • Videos
  • Collections
    • In-Press Preview
    • Resource and Technical Advances
    • Clinical Research and Public Health
    • Research Letters
    • Editorials
    • Perspectives
    • Physician-Scientist Development
    • Reviews
    • Top read articles

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Specialties
  • In-Press Preview
  • Resource and Technical Advances
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Research Letters
  • Editorials
  • Perspectives
  • Physician-Scientist Development
  • Reviews
  • Top read articles
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
COVID-19 convalescent plasma boosts early antibody titer and does not influence the adaptive immune response
John F. McDyer, … , Philip J. Norris, for the SIREN-C3PO Investigators
John F. McDyer, … , Philip J. Norris, for the SIREN-C3PO Investigators
Published March 2, 2023
Citation Information: JCI Insight. 2023;8(8):e167890. https://doi.org/10.1172/jci.insight.167890.
View: Text | PDF
Research Article COVID-19 Immunology

COVID-19 convalescent plasma boosts early antibody titer and does not influence the adaptive immune response

  • Text
  • PDF
Abstract

Multiple randomized, controlled clinical trials have yielded discordant results regarding the efficacy of convalescent plasma in outpatients, with some showing an approximately 2-fold reduction in risk and others showing no effect. We quantified binding and neutralizing antibody levels in 492 of the 511 participants from the Clinical Trial of COVID-19 Convalescent Plasma in Outpatients (C3PO) of a single unit of COVID-19 convalescent plasma (CCP) versus saline infusion. In a subset of 70 participants, peripheral blood mononuclear cells were obtained to define the evolution of B and T cell responses through day 30. Binding and neutralizing antibody responses were approximately 2-fold higher 1 hour after infusion in recipients of CCP compared with saline plus multivitamin, but levels achieved by the native immune system by day 15 were almost 10-fold higher than those seen immediately after CCP administration. Infusion of CCP did not block generation of the host antibody response or skew B or T cell phenotype or maturation. Activated CD4+ and CD8+ T cells were associated with more severe disease outcome. These data show that CCP leads to a measurable boost in anti–SARS-CoV-2 antibodies but that the boost is modest and may not be sufficient to alter disease course.

Authors

John F. McDyer, Mahzad Azimpouran, Valerie L. Durkalski-Mauldin, Robert G. Clevenger, Sharon D. Yeatts, Xutao Deng, William Barsan, Robert Silbergleit, Nahed El Kassar, Iulia Popescu, Dimiter Dimitrov, Wei Li, Emily J. Lyons, Sophia C. Lieber, Mars Stone, Frederick K. Korley, Clifton W. Callaway, Larry J. Dumont, Philip J. Norris, for the SIREN-C3PO Investigators

×

Figure 7

Correlation between disease severity and activated T cell populations.

Options: View larger image (or click on image) Download as PowerPoint
Correlation between disease severity and activated T cell populations.
A...
All 22 cellular immune phenotypes were analyzed for association with disease outcome, with the 8-point severity scale categorized as < 3 or ≥ 3. Subjects who reported ≥ 3 symptoms on an 8-point severity scale are represented in red, and those with < 3 symptoms in blue. (A–C) Populations that showed increased levels in patients with score ≥3 included CD4+CD38+HLA-DR+ T cells (A), CD8+CD38+HLA-DR+ T cells (B), and activated cTfh cells (C), which were CD3+CD4+CD45RA–CXCR5+CD38+ICOS+ cells. Comparisons were made using a linear mixed-effect model to determine significant associations. Data are shown as mean ± SEM.

Copyright © 2025 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN 2379-3708

Sign up for email alerts