Go to The Journal of Clinical Investigation
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
  • Physician-Scientist Development
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • By specialty
    • COVID-19
    • Cardiology
    • Immunology
    • Metabolism
    • Nephrology
    • Oncology
    • Pulmonology
    • All ...
  • Videos
  • Collections
    • In-Press Preview
    • Resource and Technical Advances
    • Clinical Research and Public Health
    • Research Letters
    • Editorials
    • Perspectives
    • Physician-Scientist Development
    • Reviews
    • Top read articles

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Specialties
  • In-Press Preview
  • Resource and Technical Advances
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Research Letters
  • Editorials
  • Perspectives
  • Physician-Scientist Development
  • Reviews
  • Top read articles
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact

Usage Information

ALVAC-HIV and AIDSVAX B/E vaccination induce improved immune responses compared with AIDSVAX B/E vaccination alone
Margaret C. Costanzo, Dominic Paquin-Proulx, Alexandra Schuetz, Siriwat Akapirat, Zhanna Shubin, Dohoon Kim, Lindsay Wieczorek, Victoria R. Polonis, Hung V. Trinh, Mangala Rao, Hanna Anenia, Michael D. Barrera, Jacob Boeckelman, Barbara Nails, Pallavi Thapa, Michelle Zemil, Carlo Sacdalan, Eugene Kroon, Boot Kaewboon, Somporn Tipsuk, Surat Jongrakthaitae, Sanjay Gurunathan, Faruk Sinangil, Jerome H. Kim, Merlin L. Robb, Julie A. Ake, Robert J. O’Connell, Punnee Pitisutthithum, Sorachai Nitayaphan, Suwat Chariyalertsak, Michael A. Eller, Nittaya Phanuphak, Sandhya Vasan, the RV306, RV328 study groups
Margaret C. Costanzo, Dominic Paquin-Proulx, Alexandra Schuetz, Siriwat Akapirat, Zhanna Shubin, Dohoon Kim, Lindsay Wieczorek, Victoria R. Polonis, Hung V. Trinh, Mangala Rao, Hanna Anenia, Michael D. Barrera, Jacob Boeckelman, Barbara Nails, Pallavi Thapa, Michelle Zemil, Carlo Sacdalan, Eugene Kroon, Boot Kaewboon, Somporn Tipsuk, Surat Jongrakthaitae, Sanjay Gurunathan, Faruk Sinangil, Jerome H. Kim, Merlin L. Robb, Julie A. Ake, Robert J. O’Connell, Punnee Pitisutthithum, Sorachai Nitayaphan, Suwat Chariyalertsak, Michael A. Eller, Nittaya Phanuphak, Sandhya Vasan, the RV306, RV328 study groups
View: Text | PDF
Research Article AIDS/HIV

ALVAC-HIV and AIDSVAX B/E vaccination induce improved immune responses compared with AIDSVAX B/E vaccination alone

  • Text
  • PDF
Abstract

The RV144 phase III vaccine trial demonstrated that ALVAC-HIV and AIDSVAX B/E administration over 6 months resulted in 31% efficacy in preventing HIV acquisition, while administration of AIDSVAX B/E alone in both VAX003 and VAX004 studies failed to show efficacy. In this study, we aimed to understand the impact of ALVAC-HIV on the development of cellular, humoral, and functional immune responses compared to the administration of AIDSVAX B/E alone. ALVAC-HIV in combination with 3 doses of AIDSVAX B/E significantly increased CD4+ HIV-specific T cell responses, polyfunctionality, and proliferation compared with 3 doses of AIDSVAX B/E alone. Additionally, Env-specific plasmablasts and A244-specific memory B cells were identified with a significantly higher magnitude in the group that received ALVAC-HIV. Subsequently, data revealed increased magnitude of plasma IgG binding to and avidity for HIV Env in participants who received ALVAC-HIV compared with 3 doses of AIDSVAX B/E alone. Lastly, levels of the Fc-mediated effector functions antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity, NK cell activation, and trogocytosis were significantly increased in participants who received ALVAC-HIV compared with those receiving AIDSVAX B/E alone. Taken together, these results suggest that ALVAC-HIV plays an essential role in developing cellular and humoral immune responses to protein-boosted regimens relative to protein alone.

Authors

Margaret C. Costanzo, Dominic Paquin-Proulx, Alexandra Schuetz, Siriwat Akapirat, Zhanna Shubin, Dohoon Kim, Lindsay Wieczorek, Victoria R. Polonis, Hung V. Trinh, Mangala Rao, Hanna Anenia, Michael D. Barrera, Jacob Boeckelman, Barbara Nails, Pallavi Thapa, Michelle Zemil, Carlo Sacdalan, Eugene Kroon, Boot Kaewboon, Somporn Tipsuk, Surat Jongrakthaitae, Sanjay Gurunathan, Faruk Sinangil, Jerome H. Kim, Merlin L. Robb, Julie A. Ake, Robert J. O’Connell, Punnee Pitisutthithum, Sorachai Nitayaphan, Suwat Chariyalertsak, Michael A. Eller, Nittaya Phanuphak, Sandhya Vasan, the RV306, RV328 study groups

×

Usage data is cumulative from December 2024 through December 2025.

Usage JCI PMC
Text version 557 475
PDF 130 36
Figure 275 0
Supplemental data 69 1
Citation downloads 84 0
Totals 1,115 512
Total Views 1,627

Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.

Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.

Advertisement

Copyright © 2025 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN 2379-3708

Sign up for email alerts