Usage Information
Citation Information: JCI Insight. 2023;8(1):e165299. https://doi.org/10.1172/jci.insight.165299.
Abstract
Understanding persistence and evolution of B cell clones after COVID-19 infection and vaccination is crucial for predicting responses against emerging viral variants and optimizing vaccines. Here, we collected longitudinal samples from patients with severe COVID-19 every third to seventh day during hospitalization and every third month after recovery. We profiled their antigen-specific immune cell dynamics by combining single-cell RNA-Seq, Cellular Indexing of Transcriptomes and Epitopes by Sequencing (CITE-Seq), and B cell receptor–Seq (BCR-Seq) with oligo-tagged antigen baits. While the proportion of Spike receptor binding domain–specific memory B cells (MBC) increased from 3 months after infection, the other Spike- and Nucleocapsid-specific B cells remained constant. All patients showed ongoing class switching and sustained affinity maturation of antigen-specific cells, and affinity maturation was not significantly increased early after vaccine. B cell analysis revealed a polyclonal response with limited clonal expansion; nevertheless, some clones detected during hospitalization, as plasmablasts, persisted for up to 1 year, as MBC. Monoclonal antibodies derived from persistent B cell families increased their binding and neutralization breadth and started recognizing viral variants by 3 months after infection. Overall, our findings provide important insights into the clonal evolution and dynamics of antigen-specific B cell responses in longitudinally sampled patients infected with COVID-19.
Authors
Lydia Scharf, Hannes Axelsson, Aikaterini Emmanouilidi, Nimitha R. Mathew, Daniel J. Sheward, Susannah Leach, Pauline Isakson, Ilya V. Smirnov, Emelie Marklund, Nicolae Miron, Lars-Magnus Andersson, Magnus Gisslén, Ben Murrell, Anna Lundgren, Mats Bemark, Davide Angeletti
Usage data is cumulative from February 2024 through February 2025.
| Usage | JCI | PMC |
|---|---|---|
| Text version | 1,633 | 818 |
| 196 | 123 | |
| Figure | 517 | 23 |
| Table | 35 | 0 |
| Supplemental data | 142 | 75 |
| Citation downloads | 59 | 0 |
| Totals | 2,582 | 1,039 |
| Total Views | 3,621 | |
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.
