Go to The Journal of Clinical Investigation
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
  • Physician-Scientist Development
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • By specialty
    • COVID-19
    • Cardiology
    • Immunology
    • Metabolism
    • Nephrology
    • Oncology
    • Pulmonology
    • All ...
  • Videos
  • Collections
    • In-Press Preview
    • Resource and Technical Advances
    • Clinical Research and Public Health
    • Research Letters
    • Editorials
    • Perspectives
    • Physician-Scientist Development
    • Reviews
    • Top read articles

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Specialties
  • In-Press Preview
  • Resource and Technical Advances
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Research Letters
  • Editorials
  • Perspectives
  • Physician-Scientist Development
  • Reviews
  • Top read articles
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact

Usage Information

Longitudinal single-cell analysis of SARS-CoV-2–reactive B cells uncovers persistence of early-formed, antigen-specific clones
Lydia Scharf, Hannes Axelsson, Aikaterini Emmanouilidi, Nimitha R. Mathew, Daniel J. Sheward, Susannah Leach, Pauline Isakson, Ilya V. Smirnov, Emelie Marklund, Nicolae Miron, Lars-Magnus Andersson, Magnus Gisslén, Ben Murrell, Anna Lundgren, Mats Bemark, Davide Angeletti
Lydia Scharf, Hannes Axelsson, Aikaterini Emmanouilidi, Nimitha R. Mathew, Daniel J. Sheward, Susannah Leach, Pauline Isakson, Ilya V. Smirnov, Emelie Marklund, Nicolae Miron, Lars-Magnus Andersson, Magnus Gisslén, Ben Murrell, Anna Lundgren, Mats Bemark, Davide Angeletti
View: Text | PDF
Research Article COVID-19 Immunology

Longitudinal single-cell analysis of SARS-CoV-2–reactive B cells uncovers persistence of early-formed, antigen-specific clones

  • Text
  • PDF
Abstract

Understanding persistence and evolution of B cell clones after COVID-19 infection and vaccination is crucial for predicting responses against emerging viral variants and optimizing vaccines. Here, we collected longitudinal samples from patients with severe COVID-19 every third to seventh day during hospitalization and every third month after recovery. We profiled their antigen-specific immune cell dynamics by combining single-cell RNA-Seq, Cellular Indexing of Transcriptomes and Epitopes by Sequencing (CITE-Seq), and B cell receptor–Seq (BCR-Seq) with oligo-tagged antigen baits. While the proportion of Spike receptor binding domain–specific memory B cells (MBC) increased from 3 months after infection, the other Spike- and Nucleocapsid-specific B cells remained constant. All patients showed ongoing class switching and sustained affinity maturation of antigen-specific cells, and affinity maturation was not significantly increased early after vaccine. B cell analysis revealed a polyclonal response with limited clonal expansion; nevertheless, some clones detected during hospitalization, as plasmablasts, persisted for up to 1 year, as MBC. Monoclonal antibodies derived from persistent B cell families increased their binding and neutralization breadth and started recognizing viral variants by 3 months after infection. Overall, our findings provide important insights into the clonal evolution and dynamics of antigen-specific B cell responses in longitudinally sampled patients infected with COVID-19.

Authors

Lydia Scharf, Hannes Axelsson, Aikaterini Emmanouilidi, Nimitha R. Mathew, Daniel J. Sheward, Susannah Leach, Pauline Isakson, Ilya V. Smirnov, Emelie Marklund, Nicolae Miron, Lars-Magnus Andersson, Magnus Gisslén, Ben Murrell, Anna Lundgren, Mats Bemark, Davide Angeletti

×

Usage data is cumulative from March 2025 through March 2026.

Usage JCI PMC
Text version 2,393 482
PDF 264 68
Figure 702 2
Table 76 0
Supplemental data 199 18
Citation downloads 97 0
Totals 3,731 570
Total Views 4,301

Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.

Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.

Advertisement

Copyright © 2026 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN 2379-3708

Sign up for email alerts