Go to The Journal of Clinical Investigation
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
  • Physician-Scientist Development
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • By specialty
    • COVID-19
    • Cardiology
    • Immunology
    • Metabolism
    • Nephrology
    • Oncology
    • Pulmonology
    • All ...
  • Videos
  • Collections
    • In-Press Preview
    • Resource and Technical Advances
    • Clinical Research and Public Health
    • Research Letters
    • Editorials
    • Perspectives
    • Physician-Scientist Development
    • Reviews
    • Top read articles

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Specialties
  • In-Press Preview
  • Resource and Technical Advances
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Research Letters
  • Editorials
  • Perspectives
  • Physician-Scientist Development
  • Reviews
  • Top read articles
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact

Usage Information

T cell responses to SARS-CoV-2 vaccination differ by disease-modifying therapy for multiple sclerosis
Asia-Sophia Wolf, Anthony Ravussin, Marton König, Mathias H. Øverås, Guri Solum, Ingrid Fadum Kjønstad, Adity Chopra, Trygve Holmøy, Hanne F. Harbo, Silje Watterdal Syversen, Kristin Kaasen Jørgensen, Einar August Høgestøl, Jon Torgils Vaage, Elisabeth G. Celius, Fridtjof Lund-Johansen, Ludvig A. Munthe, Gro Owren Nygaard, Siri Mjaaland
Asia-Sophia Wolf, Anthony Ravussin, Marton König, Mathias H. Øverås, Guri Solum, Ingrid Fadum Kjønstad, Adity Chopra, Trygve Holmøy, Hanne F. Harbo, Silje Watterdal Syversen, Kristin Kaasen Jørgensen, Einar August Høgestøl, Jon Torgils Vaage, Elisabeth G. Celius, Fridtjof Lund-Johansen, Ludvig A. Munthe, Gro Owren Nygaard, Siri Mjaaland
View: Text | PDF
Research Article COVID-19 Immunology

T cell responses to SARS-CoV-2 vaccination differ by disease-modifying therapy for multiple sclerosis

  • Text
  • PDF
Abstract

Immune responses in people with multiple sclerosis (pwMS) receiving disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) have been of significant interest throughout the COVID-19 pandemic. Lymphocyte-targeting immunotherapies, including anti-CD20 treatments and sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor (S1PR) modulators, attenuate Ab responses after vaccination. Evaluation of cellular responses after vaccination, therefore, is of particular importance in these populations. In this study, we used flow cytometry to analyze CD4 and CD8 T cell functional responses to SARS-CoV-2 spike peptides in healthy control study participants and pwMS receiving 5 different DMTs. Although pwMS receiving rituximab and fingolimod therapies had low Ab responses after both 2 and 3 vaccine doses, T cell responses in pwMS taking rituximab were preserved after a third vaccination, even when an additional dose of rituximab was administered between vaccine doses 2 and 3. PwMS taking fingolimod had low detectable T cell responses in peripheral blood. CD4 and CD8 T cell responses to SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern Delta and Omicron were lower than to the ancestral Wuhan-Hu-1 variant. Our results indicate the importance of assessing both cellular and humoral responses after vaccination and suggest that, even in the absence of robust Ab responses, vaccination can generate immune responses in pwMS.

Authors

Asia-Sophia Wolf, Anthony Ravussin, Marton König, Mathias H. Øverås, Guri Solum, Ingrid Fadum Kjønstad, Adity Chopra, Trygve Holmøy, Hanne F. Harbo, Silje Watterdal Syversen, Kristin Kaasen Jørgensen, Einar August Høgestøl, Jon Torgils Vaage, Elisabeth G. Celius, Fridtjof Lund-Johansen, Ludvig A. Munthe, Gro Owren Nygaard, Siri Mjaaland

×

Usage data is cumulative from December 2024 through December 2025.

Usage JCI PMC
Text version 830 45
PDF 135 8
Figure 212 0
Table 39 0
Supplemental data 94 2
Citation downloads 112 0
Totals 1,422 55
Total Views 1,477

Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.

Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.

Advertisement

Copyright © 2025 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN 2379-3708

Sign up for email alerts