Go to The Journal of Clinical Investigation
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • By specialty
    • COVID-19
    • Cardiology
    • Immunology
    • Metabolism
    • Nephrology
    • Oncology
    • Pulmonology
    • All ...
  • Videos
  • Collections
    • Resource and Technical Advances
    • Clinical Medicine
    • Reviews
    • Editorials
    • Perspectives
    • Top read articles
  • JCI This Month
    • Current issue
    • Past issues

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Specialties
  • In-Press Preview
  • Editorials
  • Viewpoint
  • Top read articles
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
Acute high-fat diet impairs macrophage-supported intestinal damage resolution
Andrea A. Hill, … , Randy S. Longman, Gretchen E. Diehl
Andrea A. Hill, … , Randy S. Longman, Gretchen E. Diehl
Published December 20, 2022
Citation Information: JCI Insight. 2023;8(3):e164489. https://doi.org/10.1172/jci.insight.164489.
View: Text | PDF
Research Article Immunology

Acute high-fat diet impairs macrophage-supported intestinal damage resolution

  • Text
  • PDF
Abstract

Chronic exposure to high-fat diets (HFD) worsens intestinal disease pathology, but acute effects of HFD in tissue damage remain unclear. Here, we used short-term HFD feeding in a model of intestinal injury and found sustained damage with increased cecal dead neutrophil accumulation, along with dietary lipid accumulation. Neutrophil depletion rescued enhanced pathology. Macrophages from HFD-treated mice showed reduced capacity to engulf dead neutrophils. Macrophage clearance of dead neutrophils activates critical barrier repair and antiinflammatory pathways, including IL-10, which was lost after acute HFD feeding and intestinal injury. IL-10 overexpression restored intestinal repair after HFD feeding and intestinal injury. Macrophage exposure to lipids from the HFD prevented tethering and uptake of apoptotic cells and Il10 induction. Milk fat globule-EGF factor 8 (MFGE8) is a bridging molecule that facilitates macrophage uptake of dead cells. MFGE8 also facilitates lipid uptake, and we demonstrate that dietary lipids interfere with MFGE8-mediated macrophage apoptotic neutrophil uptake and subsequent Il10 production. Our findings demonstrate that HFD promotes intestinal pathology by interfering with macrophage clearance of dead neutrophils, leading to unresolved tissue damage.

Authors

Andrea A. Hill, Myunghoo Kim, Daniel F. Zegarra-Ruiz, Lin-Chun Chang, Kendra Norwood, Adrien Assié, Wan-Jung H. Wu, Michael C. Renfroe, Hyo Wong Song, Angela M. Major, Buck S. Samuel, Joseph M. Hyser, Randy S. Longman, Gretchen E. Diehl

×

Figure 10

Dietary lipids impair MFGE8-mediated apoptotic neutrophil uptake.

Options: View larger image (or click on image) Download as PowerPoint
Dietary lipids impair MFGE8-mediated apoptotic neutrophil uptake.
(A and...
(A and B) Representative immunofluorescence staining and quantification for MFGE8 and TUNEL in the cecum of LFD- and HFD-fed mice at indicated day after DSS. Average of 3 HPF images (n = 4 D0 and D5, n = 8 D9) mice/group. (C) Representative images for TAMRA (apoptotic neutrophils) in control-treated BMDMs or BMDMs. (D) Representative images for BODIPY (lipid droplets) in control-treated BMDMs or BMDMs. (E) Quantification of TAMRA+ BMDMs in C. (F) Quantification of BODIPY in BMDMs in D. Data are representative of 2 experiments with 2 images per 3 technical replicates (E and F). (G) IL-10 gene expression in control- or oleic acid–treated BMDMs after exposure to apoptotic neutrophils alone or in the presence of rmMFGE8 (2 mg/mL). Two experiments were performed, with 4 technical replicates/group. Data are presented as mean ± SEM. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001, ****P < 0.0001. Statistical comparisons were performed using 1-way ANOVA with Tukey’s post hoc test (B and E–G), and if not indicated, a comparison is not significant. Scale bars: 100 μm or 10 μm, as indicated.

Copyright © 2023 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN 2379-3708

Sign up for email alerts