Usage Information
Abstract
Substantial clinical evidence supports the notion that ciliary function in the airways is important in COVID-19 pathogenesis. Although ciliary damage has been observed in both in vitro and in vivo models, the extent or nature of impairment of mucociliary transport (MCT) in in vivo models remains unknown. We hypothesize that SARS-CoV-2 infection results in MCT deficiency in the airways of golden Syrian hamsters that precedes pathological injury in lung parenchyma. Micro-optical coherence tomography was used to quantitate functional changes in the MCT apparatus. Both genomic and subgenomic viral RNA pathological and physiological changes were monitored in parallel. We show that SARS-CoV-2 infection caused a 67% decrease in MCT rate as early as 2 days postinfection (dpi) in hamsters, principally due to 79% diminished airway coverage of motile cilia. Correlating quantitation of physiological, virological, and pathological changes reveals steadily descending infection from the upper airways to lower airways to lung parenchyma within 7 dpi. Our results indicate that functional deficits of the MCT apparatus are a key aspect of COVID-19 pathogenesis, may extend viral retention, and could pose a risk factor for secondary infection. Clinically, monitoring abnormal ciliated cell function may indicate disease progression. Therapies directed toward the MCT apparatus deserve further investigation.
Authors
Qian Li, Kadambari Vijaykumar, Scott E. Phillips, Shah S. Hussain, Nha V. Huynh, Courtney M. Fernandez-Petty, Jacelyn E. Peabody Lever, Jeremy B. Foote, Janna Ren, Javier Campos-Gómez, Farah Abou Daya, Nathaniel W. Hubbs, Harrison Kim, Ezinwanne Onuoha, Evan R. Boitet, Lianwu Fu, Hui Min Leung, Linhui Yu, Thomas W. Detchemendy, Levi T. Schaefers, Jennifer L. Tipper, Lloyd J. Edwards, Sixto M. Leal Jr., Kevin S. Harrod, Guillermo J. Tearney, Steven M. Rowe
Usage data is cumulative from March 2025 through March 2026.
| Usage | JCI | PMC |
|---|---|---|
| Text version | 1,299 | 105 |
| 145 | 28 | |
| Figure | 310 | 0 |
| Table | 49 | 0 |
| Supplemental data | 114 | 0 |
| Citation downloads | 86 | 0 |
| Totals | 2,003 | 133 |
| Total Views | 2,136 | |
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.
