Usage Information
Citation Information: JCI Insight. 2022;7(20):e160274. https://doi.org/10.1172/jci.insight.160274.
Abstract
Uterine fibroids (leiomyomas) affect Black women disproportionately compared with women of other races and ethnicities in terms of prevalence, incidence, and severity of symptoms. The causes of this racial disparity are essentially unknown. We hypothesized that myometria of Black women are more susceptible to developing fibroids, and we examined the transcriptomic and DNA methylation profiles of myometria and fibroids from Black and White women for comparison. Myometrial samples cluster by race in both their transcriptome and DNA methylation profiles, whereas fibroid samples only cluster by race in the latter. More differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were detected in the Black and White myometrial sample comparison than in the fibroid comparison. Leiomyoma gene set expression analysis identified 4 clusters of DEGs, including a cluster of 24 genes with higher expression in myometrial samples from Black women. One of the DEGs in this group, von Willibrands factor (VWF), was significantly hypomethylated in both myometrial samples from Black women and in all fibroids at 2 CpG probes that are near a putative enhancer site and that are correlated with VWF expression levels. These results suggest that the molecular basis for the disparity in fibroid disease between Black and White women could be found in the myometria before fibroid development and not in the fibroids themselves.
Authors
Emmanuel N. Paul, Joshua A. Grey, Tyler J. Carpenter, Zachary B. Madaj, Kin H. Lau, Scott A. Givan, Gregory W. Burns, Ronald L. Chandler, Ganesa R. Wegienka, Hui Shen, Jose M. Teixeira
Usage data is cumulative from September 2022 through February 2023.
| Usage | JCI | PMC |
|---|---|---|
| Text version | 3,485 | 23 |
| 684 | 5 | |
| Figure | 139 | 0 |
| Table | 26 | 0 |
| Supplemental data | 368 | 0 |
| Citation downloads | 58 | 0 |
| Totals | 4,760 | 28 |
| Total Views | 4,788 | |
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.
