Go to The Journal of Clinical Investigation
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
  • Physician-Scientist Development
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • By specialty
    • COVID-19
    • Cardiology
    • Immunology
    • Metabolism
    • Nephrology
    • Oncology
    • Pulmonology
    • All ...
  • Videos
  • Collections
    • In-Press Preview
    • Resource and Technical Advances
    • Clinical Research and Public Health
    • Research Letters
    • Editorials
    • Perspectives
    • Physician-Scientist Development
    • Reviews
    • Top read articles

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Specialties
  • In-Press Preview
  • Resource and Technical Advances
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Research Letters
  • Editorials
  • Perspectives
  • Physician-Scientist Development
  • Reviews
  • Top read articles
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
Cell-free DNA topology depends on its subcellular and cellular origins in cancer
Ethan Z. Malkin, Steven De Michino, Meghan Lambie, Rita Gill, Zhen Zhao, Ariana Rostami, Andrea Arruda, Mark D. Minden, Scott V. Bratman
Ethan Z. Malkin, Steven De Michino, Meghan Lambie, Rita Gill, Zhen Zhao, Ariana Rostami, Andrea Arruda, Mark D. Minden, Scott V. Bratman
View: Text | PDF
Resource and Technical Advance Cell biology Oncology

Cell-free DNA topology depends on its subcellular and cellular origins in cancer

  • Text
  • PDF
Abstract

Cancer cells release large quantities of cell-free DNA (cfDNA) into the surrounding tissue and circulation. As cfDNA is a common source of biomarkers for liquid biopsy and has been implicated as a functional mediator for intercellular communication, fundamental characterization of cfDNA topology has widespread biological and clinical ramifications. Whether the topology of cfDNA is such that it exists predominantly in membrane-bound extracellular vesicles (EVs) or in nonvesicular DNA-protein complexes remains poorly understood. Here, we employed a DNA-targeted approach to comprehensively assess total cfDNA topology in cancer. Using preclinical models and patient samples, we demonstrate that nuclear cfDNA is predominantly associated with nucleosomal particles and not EVs, while a substantial subset of mitochondrial cfDNA is membrane protected and disproportionately derived from nontumor cells. In addition, discrimination between membrane-protected and accessible mitochondrial cfDNA added diagnostic and prognostic value in a cohort of head and neck cancer patients. Our results support a revised model for cfDNA topology in cancer. Due to its abundance, nuclear cfDNA within nucleosomal particles is the most compelling liquid biopsy substrate, while EV-bound and accessible mitochondrial cfDNA represent distinct reservoirs of potential cancer biomarkers whose structural conformations may also influence their extracellular stability and propensity for uptake by recipient cells.

Authors

Ethan Z. Malkin, Steven De Michino, Meghan Lambie, Rita Gill, Zhen Zhao, Ariana Rostami, Andrea Arruda, Mark D. Minden, Scott V. Bratman

×

Figure 3

Distinct cellular mechanisms regulate the release of protected mtDNA and accessible mtDNA and nDNA.

Options: View larger image (or click on image) Download as PowerPoint
Distinct cellular mechanisms regulate the release of protected mtDNA and...
(A) Relative recovery of mtDNA from conditioned media of MCF10A, B16F10, and HCT116 cells by DNA-IP and IgG control. Dotted red line indicates mean relative recovery of nDNA from these cell lines. (B) Permeabilization/degradation assays on conditioned media from MCF10A, B16F10, and HCT116 cells. Values were normalized to their respective PBS/mock treatment. (C) Timeline of EV inhibitor treatment. HCT116 cells were seeded on day 0, followed by treatment on day 1 with Y-27632 or GW4869; control treatment groups received equivalent volume of vehicle. Media were harvested from each treatment group on day 2 and subjected to downstream analyses. (D) Left: Particle concentration in conditioned media quantified by nanoparticle tracking analysis (NTA). Middle: cf-mtDNA concentration in conditioned media. Right: cf-nDNA concentration in conditioned media. Values were normalized to the vehicle control. (E) Mean particle size for each inhibitor, as determined by NTA, normalized to the vehicle control. (F) Abundance of mtDNA in the pellet (i.e., accessible) or supernatant (i.e., protected) after DNA-IP of inhibitor-treated media, normalized to the vehicle control for each fraction. (G) Left: Immunoblotting of histone H3 after histone IP of conditioned media from vehicle- and inhibitor-treated cells. Representative image of blot from HCT116-conditioned media. Right: Histone H3 band intensity, normalized to the vehicle control. (H) Schematic depicting ROCK1/2- and sMNase2-regulated mechanisms of accessible and protected cfDNA. ROCK1/2 mediates biogenesis of large EVs, which contain mtDNA; independently, ROCK1/2 also contributes to the pool of accessible cf-mtDNA. Conversely, sMNase mediates release of accessible nDNA and mtDNA independent of its role in small EV biogenesis. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001, ****P < 0.0001, ordinary 2-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple-comparison test (B); unpaired 2-sided t test (D–G).

Copyright © 2026 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN 2379-3708

Sign up for email alerts