Go to The Journal of Clinical Investigation
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • By specialty
    • COVID-19
    • Cardiology
    • Immunology
    • Metabolism
    • Nephrology
    • Oncology
    • Pulmonology
    • All ...
  • Videos
  • Collections
    • Resource and Technical Advances
    • Clinical Medicine
    • Reviews
    • Editorials
    • Perspectives
    • Top read articles
  • JCI This Month
    • Current issue
    • Past issues

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Specialties
  • In-Press Preview
  • Concise Communication
  • Editorials
  • Viewpoint
  • Top read articles
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
Augmenting chemotherapy with low-dose decitabine through an immune-independent mechanism
Wade R. Gutierrez, … , Varun Monga, Rebecca D. Dodd
Wade R. Gutierrez, … , Varun Monga, Rebecca D. Dodd
Published October 13, 2022
Citation Information: JCI Insight. 2022;7(22):e159419. https://doi.org/10.1172/jci.insight.159419.
View: Text | PDF
Research Article Oncology

Augmenting chemotherapy with low-dose decitabine through an immune-independent mechanism

  • Text
  • PDF
Abstract

The DNA methyltransferase inhibitor decitabine has classically been used to reactivate silenced genes and as a pretreatment for anticancer therapies. In a variation of this idea, this study explores the concept of adding low-dose decitabine (DAC) following administration of chemotherapy to bolster therapeutic efficacy. We find that addition of DAC following treatment with the chemotherapy agent gemcitabine improves survival and slows tumor growth in a mouse model of high-grade sarcoma. Unlike prior studies in epithelial tumor models, DAC did not induce a robust antitumor T cell response in sarcoma. Furthermore, DAC synergizes with gemcitabine independently of the immune system. Mechanistic analyses demonstrate that the combination therapy induces biphasic cell cycle arrest and apoptosis. Therapeutic efficacy was sequence dependent, with gemcitabine priming cells for treatment with DAC through inhibition of ribonucleotide reductase. This study identifies an apparently unique application of DAC to augment the cytotoxic effects of conventional chemotherapy in an immune-independent manner. The concepts explored in this study represent a promising paradigm for cancer treatment by augmenting chemotherapy through addition of DAC to increase tolerability and improve patient response. These findings have widespread implications for the treatment of sarcomas and other aggressive malignancies.

Authors

Wade R. Gutierrez, Amanda Scherer, Jeffrey D. Rytlewski, Emily A. Laverty, Alexa P. Sheehan, Gavin R. McGivney, Qierra R. Brockman, Vickie Knepper-Adrian, Grace A. Roughton, Dawn E. Quelle, David J. Gordon, Varun Monga, Rebecca D. Dodd

×

Figure 5

Decreased cellular dCTP drives increased efficacy of Gem + DAC.

Options: View larger image (or click on image) Download as PowerPoint
Decreased cellular dCTP drives increased efficacy of Gem + DAC.
(A) Gem ...
(A) Gem causes direct termination of DNA polymerization and irreversible inhibition of RNR, resulting in decreased levels of dCTP. Thy inhibits RNR and causes a similar decrease in dCTP levels. (B) Treatment schematic for Gem + DAC and Thy + DAC single-agent and combination approaches. (C) At day 4, Thy and Thy + DAC decrease viability to the same extent as Gem and Gem + DAC, respectively. (D) Day 4 G2/M analysis using EdU/PI staining shows similar cell cycle arrest in Thy-containing treatments. Complete statistical analysis of C and D is available in Supplemental Figure 12. (E) Gem inhibits RNR, decreasing cellular dCTP and increasing the ratio of DAC to dCTP. Levels of dCTP can be directly augmented by addition of exogenous deoxycytidine (dC), but not uridine (U), due to inhibition of RNR by Gem. (F) Uridine (30 μM) or dC (30 μM) was added during DAC or DMSO treatment on days 2 and 3. (G and H) Addition of dC, but not uridine, rescued the effects of DAC on viability and G2/M arrest in cells treated with both DAC and Gem + DAC treatments. Complete statistical analysis of the data in G and H is available in Supplemental Figures 13 and 14. Data in C, D, G, and H represent independent experiments (n = 3) and the mean ± SEM. Ordinary 1-way ANOVA and Tukey’s multiple comparisons test used for analysis. *P < 0.05.

Copyright © 2023 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN 2379-3708

Sign up for email alerts