Usage Information
Citation Information: JCI Insight. 2022;7(19):e158314. https://doi.org/10.1172/jci.insight.158314.
Abstract
BACKGROUND During aging, there is a functional decline in the pool of muscle stem cells (MuSCs) that influences the functional and regenerative capacity of skeletal muscle. Preclinical evidence has suggested that nicotinamide riboside (NR) and pterostilbene (PT) can improve muscle regeneration, e.g., by increasing MuSC function. The objective of this study was to investigate if supplementation with NR and PT (NRPT) promotes skeletal muscle regeneration after muscle injury in elderly individuals by improved recruitment of MuSCs.METHODS Thirty-two elderly individuals (55–80 years of age) were randomized to daily supplementation with either NRPT (1,000 mg NR and 200 mg PT) or matched placebo. Two weeks after initiation of supplementation, skeletal muscle injury was induced by electrically induced eccentric muscle work. Skeletal muscle biopsies were obtained before, 2 hours after, and 2, 8, and 30 days after injury.RESULTS A substantial skeletal muscle injury was induced by the protocol and associated with release of myoglobin and creatine kinase, muscle soreness, tissue edema, and a decrease in muscle strength. MuSC content, proliferation, and cell size revealed a large demand for recruitment after injury, but this was not affected by NRPT. Furthermore, histological analyses of muscle fiber area, central nuclei, and embryonic myosin heavy chain showed no NRPT supplementation effect.CONCLUSION Daily supplementation with 1,000 mg NR and 200 mg PT is safe but does not improve recruitment of the MuSC pool or other measures of muscle recovery in response to injury or subsequent regeneration in elderly individuals.TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03754842.FUNDING Novo Nordisk Foundation (NNF17OC0027242) and Novo Nordisk Foundation CBMR.
Authors
Jonas Brorson Jensen, Ole L. Dollerup, Andreas B. Møller, Tine B. Billeskov, Emilie Dalbram, Sabina Chubanava, Mads V. Damgaard, Ryan W. Dellinger, Kajetan Trošt, Thomas Moritz, Steffen Ringgaard, Niels Møller, Jonas T. Treebak, Jean Farup, Niels Jessen
Usage data is cumulative from November 2023 through November 2024.
| Usage | JCI | PMC |
|---|---|---|
| Text version | 1,141 | 484 |
| 258 | 151 | |
| Figure | 144 | 1 |
| Table | 18 | 0 |
| Supplemental data | 35 | 8 |
| Citation downloads | 41 | 0 |
| Totals | 1,637 | 644 |
| Total Views | 2,281 | |
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.
