Usage Information
Citation Information: JCI Insight. 2023;8(21):e158002. https://doi.org/10.1172/jci.insight.158002.
Abstract
Chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD) is a major complication after lung transplantation that results from a complex interplay of innate inflammatory and alloimmune factors, culminating in parenchymal and/or obliterative airway fibrosis. Excessive IL-17A signaling and chronic inflammation have been recognized as key factors in these pathological processes. Herein, we developed a model of repeated airway inflammation in mouse minor alloantigen-mismatched single-lung transplantation. Repeated intratracheal LPS instillations augmented pulmonary IL-17A expression. LPS also increased acute rejection, airway epithelial damage, and obliterative airway fibrosis, similar to human explanted lung allografts with antecedent episodes of airway infection. We then investigated the role of donor and recipient IL-17 receptor A (IL-17RA) in this context. Donor IL-17RA deficiency significantly attenuated acute rejection and CLAD features, whereas recipient IL-17RA deficiency only slightly reduced airway obliteration in LPS allografts. IL-17RA immunofluorescence positive staining was greater in human CLAD lungs compared with control human lung specimens, with localization to fibroblasts and myofibroblasts, which was also seen in mouse LPS allografts. Taken together, repeated airway inflammation after lung transplantation caused local airway epithelial damage, with persistent elevation of IL-17A and IL-17RA expression and particular involvement of IL-17RA on donor structural cells in development of fibrosis.
Authors
Tatsuaki Watanabe, Stephen C. Juvet, Gregory Berra, Jan Havlin, Wenshan Zhong, Kristen Boonstra, Tina Daigneault, Miho Horie, Chihiro Konoeda, Grace Teskey, Zehong Guan, David M. Hwang, Mingyao Liu, Shaf Keshavjee, Tereza Martinu
Usage data is cumulative from November 2023 through November 2023.
| Usage | JCI | PMC |
|---|---|---|
| Text version | 657 | 0 |
| 252 | 0 | |
| Figure | 152 | 0 |
| Supplemental data | 52 | 0 |
| Citation downloads | 6 | 0 |
| Totals | 1,119 | 0 |
| Total Views | 1,119 | |
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.
