Go to The Journal of Clinical Investigation
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
  • Physician-Scientist Development
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • By specialty
    • COVID-19
    • Cardiology
    • Immunology
    • Metabolism
    • Nephrology
    • Oncology
    • Pulmonology
    • All ...
  • Videos
  • Collections
    • In-Press Preview
    • Resource and Technical Advances
    • Clinical Research and Public Health
    • Research Letters
    • Editorials
    • Perspectives
    • Physician-Scientist Development
    • Reviews
    • Top read articles

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Specialties
  • In-Press Preview
  • Resource and Technical Advances
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Research Letters
  • Editorials
  • Perspectives
  • Physician-Scientist Development
  • Reviews
  • Top read articles
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
Targeting genome integrity dysfunctions impedes metastatic potency in non–small cell lung cancer circulating tumor cell–derived explants
Tala Tayoun, Vincent Faugeroux, Marianne Oulhen, Olivier Déas, Judith Michels, Laura Brulle-Soumare, Stefano Cairo, Jean-Yves Scoazec, Virginie Marty, Agathe Aberlenc, David Planchard, Jordi Remon, Santiago Ponce, Benjamin Besse, Patricia L. Kannouche, Jean-Gabriel Judde, Patrycja Pawlikowska, Françoise Farace
Tala Tayoun, Vincent Faugeroux, Marianne Oulhen, Olivier Déas, Judith Michels, Laura Brulle-Soumare, Stefano Cairo, Jean-Yves Scoazec, Virginie Marty, Agathe Aberlenc, David Planchard, Jordi Remon, Santiago Ponce, Benjamin Besse, Patricia L. Kannouche, Jean-Gabriel Judde, Patrycja Pawlikowska, Françoise Farace
View: Text | PDF
Research Article Oncology

Targeting genome integrity dysfunctions impedes metastatic potency in non–small cell lung cancer circulating tumor cell–derived explants

  • Text
  • PDF
Abstract

DNA damage and genomic instability contribute to non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) etiology and progression. However, their therapeutic exploitation is disappointing. CTC-derived explants (CDX) offer systems for mechanistic investigation of CTC metastatic potency and may provide rationale for biology-driven therapeutics. Four CDX models and 3 CDX-derived cell lines were established from NSCLC CTCs and recapitulated patient tumor histology and response to platinum-based chemotherapy. CDX (GR-CDXL1, GR-CDXL2, GR-CDXL3, GR-CDXL4) demonstrated considerable mutational landscape similarity with patient tumor biopsy and/or single CTCs. Truncal alterations in key DNA damage response (DDR) and genome integrity–related genes were prevalent across models and assessed as therapeutic targets in vitro, in ovo, and in vivo. GR-CDXL1 presented homologous recombination deficiency linked to biallelic BRCA2 mutation and FANCA deletion, unrepaired DNA lesions after mitosis, and olaparib sensitivity, despite resistance to chemotherapy. SLFN11 overexpression in GR-CDXL4 led to olaparib sensitivity and was in coherence with neuroendocrine marker expression in patient tumor biopsy, suggesting a predictive value of SLFN11 in NSCLC histological transformation into small cell lung cancer (SCLC). Centrosome clustering promoted targetable chromosomal instability in GR-CDXL3 cells. These CDX unravel DDR and genome integrity–related defects as a central mechanism underpinning metastatic potency of CTCs and provide rationale for their therapeutic targeting in metastatic NSCLC.

Authors

Tala Tayoun, Vincent Faugeroux, Marianne Oulhen, Olivier Déas, Judith Michels, Laura Brulle-Soumare, Stefano Cairo, Jean-Yves Scoazec, Virginie Marty, Agathe Aberlenc, David Planchard, Jordi Remon, Santiago Ponce, Benjamin Besse, Patricia L. Kannouche, Jean-Gabriel Judde, Patrycja Pawlikowska, Françoise Farace

×

Figure 8

In vitro, in ovo, and in vivo drug assays.

Options: View larger image (or click on image) Download as PowerPoint
In vitro, in ovo, and in vivo drug assays.
(A) Mean in vitro IC50 values...
(A) Mean in vitro IC50 values of cisplatin for control and CDX-derived cell lines. (B) Mean in vitro IC50 values of olaparib. (C) Western blot showing SLFN11 expression levels in GR-CDXL1, GR-CDXL3, GR-CDXL4, and NSCLC cell lines. (D) qPCR for SLFN11 gene expression in A549 and CDX-derived cell lines normalized to GAPDH expression level. Data are fold change and are shown as mean ± SEM. n = 3 experiments; **P ˂ 0.01 by Kruskall-Wallis and Dunn’s test. (E) IHC staining of SLFN11 in patients L1 (CDX, cell line, and metastatic mouse tumor) and L4 (TB, CDX, cell line, metastatic mouse tumor) samples. Scale bar: 30 μm. (F) Mean in vitro IC50 values of BYL719 for control and GR-CDXL3 cell line. For A, B, and F, data are shown as mean ± SD. n = 3 experiments; *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, Kruskall-Wallis and Dunn’s test (A and B), 2-tailed unpaired t test with Welch’s correction (F). (G) Three-dimensional representative images at ID17 (left) and quantitative analysis of average fluorescent tumor foci (right) of GR-CDXL1 or GR-CDXL4 mCherry-expressing CAM tumors, treated or not with olaparib. (H) Luciferase-expressing GR-CDXL1 (left, upper panel) or GR-CDXL4 (left, lower panel) tumors treated with olaparib. Representative BLI images (left) and tumor volumes (right) obtained at indicated days of treatment are shown. (I) Tumors at day 32 (GR-CDXL1-Luc) and day 25 (GR-CDXL4-Luc). (J) Three-dimensional representative images obtained at ID17 (left) and quantitative analysis of average fluorescent tumor foci (right) of GR-CDXL3 mCherry-expressing CAM tumors treated or not with AZ82 and/or BYL719. For G and J, data are shown as mean ± SEM. n = 3 experiments; *P ˂ 0.05, **P ˂ 0.01, ***P ˂ 0.001, ****P < 0.0001 by Kruskall-Wallis and Dunn’s test. Each point represents a single embryo. (K) Representative BLI images of GR-CDXL3 luciferase–expressing mouse tumors treated or not with AZ82 and/or BYL719. Tumor volume is shown (lower panel). For H and K, data are shown as mean ± SEM. n = 5; *P ˂ 0.05, ***P ˂ 0.001, ****P ˂ 0.0001 by 2-way ANOVA. (L) GR-CDXL3 luciferase–expressing tumors obtained at day 28.

Copyright © 2026 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN 2379-3708

Sign up for email alerts