Usage Information
Citation Information: JCI Insight. 2022;7(4):e155309. https://doi.org/10.1172/jci.insight.155309.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Prostate cancer is multifocal with distinct molecular subtypes. The utility of genomic subtyping has been challenged due to inter- and intrafocal heterogeneity. We sought to characterize the subtype-defining molecular alterations of primary prostate cancer across all tumor foci within radical prostatectomy (RP) specimens and determine the prevalence of collision tumors.METHODS From the Early Detection Research Network cohort, we identified 333 prospectively collected RPs from 2010 to 2014 and assessed ETS-related gene (ERG), serine peptidase inhibitor Kazal type 1 (SPINK1), phosphatase and tensin homolog (PTEN), and speckle type BTB/POZ protein (SPOP) molecular status. We utilized dual ERG/SPINK1 immunohistochemistry and fluorescence in situ hybridization to confirm ERG rearrangements and characterize PTEN deletion, as well as high-resolution melting curve analysis and Sanger sequencing to determine SPOP mutation status.RESULTS Based on index focus alone, ERG, SPINK1, PTEN, and SPOP alterations were identified in 47.5%, 10.8%, 14.3%, and 5.1% of RP specimens, respectively. In 233 multifocal RPs with ERG/SPINK1 status in all foci, 139 (59.7%) had discordant molecular alterations between foci. Collision tumors, as defined by discrepant ERG/SPINK1 status within a single focus, were identified in 29 (9.4%) RP specimens.CONCLUSION Interfocal molecular heterogeneity was identified in about 60% of multifocal RP specimens, and collision tumors were present in about 10%. We present this phenomenon as a model for the intrafocal heterogeneity observed in previous studies and propose that future genomic studies screen for collision tumors to better characterize molecular heterogeneity.FUNDING Early Detection Research Network US National Cancer Institute (NCI) 5U01 CA111275-09, Center for Translational Pathology at Weill Cornell Medicine (WCM) Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, US NCI (WCM SPORE in Prostate Cancer, P50CA211024-01), R37CA215040, Damon Runyon Cancer Research Foundation, US MetLife Foundation Family Clinical Investigator Award, Norwegian Cancer Society (grant 208197), and South-Eastern Norway Regional Health Authority (grant 2019016 and 2020063).
Authors
Jacqueline Fontugne, Peter Y. Cai, Hussein Alnajar, Bhavneet Bhinder, Kyung Park, Huihui Ye, Shaham Beg, Verena Sailer, Javed Siddiqui, Mirjam Blattner-Johnson, Jaclyn A. Croyle, Zohal Noorzad, Carla Calagua, Theresa Y. MacDonald, Ulrika Axcrona, Mari Bogaard, Karol Axcrona, Douglas S. Scherr, Martin G. Sanda, Bjarne Johannessen, Arul M. Chinnaiyan, Olivier Elemento, Rolf I. Skotheim, Mark A. Rubin, Christopher E. Barbieri, Juan Miguel Mosquera
Usage data is cumulative from December 2022 through December 2023.
| Usage | JCI | PMC |
|---|---|---|
| Text version | 477 | 76 |
| 36 | 30 | |
| Figure | 72 | 4 |
| Table | 9 | 0 |
| Supplemental data | 14 | 2 |
| Citation downloads | 20 | 0 |
| Totals | 628 | 112 |
| Total Views | 740 | |
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.
