Go to The Journal of Clinical Investigation
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Journal stats
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
  • Physician-Scientist Development
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • By specialty
    • COVID-19
    • Cardiology
    • Immunology
    • Metabolism
    • Nephrology
    • Oncology
    • Pulmonology
    • All ...
  • Videos
  • Collections
    • In-Press Preview
    • Resource and Technical Advances
    • Clinical Research and Public Health
    • Research Letters
    • Editorials
    • Perspectives
    • Physician-Scientist Development
    • Reviews
    • Top read articles

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Specialties
  • In-Press Preview
  • Resource and Technical Advances
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Research Letters
  • Editorials
  • Perspectives
  • Physician-Scientist Development
  • Reviews
  • Top read articles
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Journal stats
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact

Usage Information

Multiplexed single-cell analysis reveals prognostic and nonprognostic T cell types in human colorectal cancer
Kazuya Masuda, Adam Kornberg, Jonathan Miller, Sijie Lin, Nathan Suek, Theo Botella, Kerim A. Secener, Alyssa M. Bacarella, Liang Cheng, Matthew Ingham, Vilma Rosario, Ahmed M. Al-Mazrou, Steven A. Lee-Kong, Ravi P. Kiran, Marlon Stoeckius, Peter Smibert, Armando Del Portillo, Paul E. Oberstein, Peter A. Sims, Kelley S. Yan, Arnold Han
Kazuya Masuda, Adam Kornberg, Jonathan Miller, Sijie Lin, Nathan Suek, Theo Botella, Kerim A. Secener, Alyssa M. Bacarella, Liang Cheng, Matthew Ingham, Vilma Rosario, Ahmed M. Al-Mazrou, Steven A. Lee-Kong, Ravi P. Kiran, Marlon Stoeckius, Peter Smibert, Armando Del Portillo, Paul E. Oberstein, Peter A. Sims, Kelley S. Yan, Arnold Han
View: Text | PDF
Research Article Immunology

Multiplexed single-cell analysis reveals prognostic and nonprognostic T cell types in human colorectal cancer

  • Text
  • PDF
Abstract

Clinical outcomes in colorectal cancer (CRC) correlate with T cell infiltrates, but the specific contributions of heterogenous T cell types remain unclear. To investigate the diverse function of T cells in CRC, we profiled 37,931 T cells from tumors and adjacent normal colon of 16 patients with CRC with respect to transcriptome, TCR sequence, and cell surface markers. Our analysis identified phenotypically and functionally distinguishable effector T cell types. We employed single-cell gene signatures from these T cell subsets to query the TCGA database to assess their prognostic significance. We found 2 distinct cytotoxic T cell types. GZMK+KLRG1+ cytotoxic T cells were enriched in CRC patients with good outcomes. GNLY+CD103+ cytotoxic T cells with a dysfunctional phenotype were not associated with good outcomes, despite coexpression of CD39 and CD103, markers that denote tumor reactivity. We found 2 distinct Treg subtypes associated with opposite outcomes. While total Tregs were associated with good outcomes, CD38+ Tregs were associated with bad outcomes independently of stage and possessed a highly suppressive phenotype, suggesting that they inhibit antitumor immunity in CRC. These findings highlight the potential utility of these subpopulations in predicting outcomes and support the potential for novel therapies directed at CD38+ Tregs or CD8+CD103+ T cells.

Authors

Kazuya Masuda, Adam Kornberg, Jonathan Miller, Sijie Lin, Nathan Suek, Theo Botella, Kerim A. Secener, Alyssa M. Bacarella, Liang Cheng, Matthew Ingham, Vilma Rosario, Ahmed M. Al-Mazrou, Steven A. Lee-Kong, Ravi P. Kiran, Marlon Stoeckius, Peter Smibert, Armando Del Portillo, Paul E. Oberstein, Peter A. Sims, Kelley S. Yan, Arnold Han

×

Usage data is cumulative from August 2025 through August 2026.

Usage JCI PMC
Text version 2,529 322
PDF 315 63
Figure 820 2
Supplemental data 192 34
Citation downloads 313 0
Totals 4,169 421
Total Views 4,590
(Click and drag on plot area to zoom in. Click legend items above to toggle)

Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.

Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.

Advertisement

Copyright © 2026 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN 2379-3708

Sign up for email alerts