Go to The Journal of Clinical Investigation
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • By specialty
    • COVID-19
    • Cardiology
    • Immunology
    • Metabolism
    • Nephrology
    • Oncology
    • Pulmonology
    • All ...
  • Videos
  • Collections
    • Resource and Technical Advances
    • Clinical Medicine
    • Reviews
    • Editorials
    • Perspectives
    • Top read articles
  • JCI This Month
    • Current issue
    • Past issues

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Specialties
  • In-Press Preview
  • Editorials
  • Viewpoint
  • Top read articles
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
Soluble PD-L1 works as a decoy in lung cancer immunotherapy via alternative polyadenylation
Ray Sagawa, … , Kengo Takeuchi, Ryohei Katayama
Ray Sagawa, … , Kengo Takeuchi, Ryohei Katayama
Published December 7, 2021
Citation Information: JCI Insight. 2022;7(1):e153323. https://doi.org/10.1172/jci.insight.153323.
View: Text | PDF
Research Article Immunology Oncology

Soluble PD-L1 works as a decoy in lung cancer immunotherapy via alternative polyadenylation

  • Text
  • PDF
Abstract

Immune checkpoint therapy targeting the PD-1/PD-L1 axis is a potentially novel development in anticancer therapy and has been applied to clinical medicine. However, there are still some problems, including a relatively low response rate, innate mechanisms of resistance against immune checkpoint blockades, and the absence of reliable biomarkers to predict responsiveness. In this study of in vitro and in vivo models, we demonstrate that PD-L1–vInt4, a splicing variant of PD-L1, plays a role as a decoy in anti–PD-L1 antibody treatment. First, we showed that PD-L1–vInt4 was detectable in clinical samples and that it was possible to visualize the secreting variants with IHC. By overexpressing the PD-L1–secreted splicing variant on MC38 cells, we observed that an immune-suppressing effect was not induced by their secretion alone. We then demonstrated that PD-L1–vInt4 secretion resisted anti–PD-L1 antibody treatment, compared with WT PD-L1, which was explicable by the PD-L1–vInt4’s decoying of the anti–PD-L1 antibody. The decoying function of PD-L1 splicing variants may be one of the reasons for cancers being resistant to anti–PD-L1 therapy. Measuring serum PD-L1 levels might be helpful in deciding the therapeutic strategy.

Authors

Ray Sagawa, Seiji Sakata, Bo Gong, Yosuke Seto, Ai Takemoto, Satoshi Takagi, Hironori Ninomiya, Noriko Yanagitani, Masayuki Nakao, Mingyon Mun, Ken Uchibori, Makoto Nishio, Yasunari Miyazaki, Yuichi Shiraishi, Seishi Ogawa, Keisuke Kataoka, Naoya Fujita, Kengo Takeuchi, Ryohei Katayama

×

Figure 3

PD-L1–vInt4 expression was found in various types of cancer.

Options: View larger image (or click on image) Download as PowerPoint
PD-L1–vInt4 expression was found in various types of cancer.
(A) The per...
(A) The percentage of cases expressing PD-L1–vInt4–specific sequence in intron 4 with FPKM ≥ 1, ≥ 2, ≥ 5, and ≥ 10 in each TCGA cancer type. (B) Structural changes associated with PD-L1–vInt4 expression in a case of HNSCC (TCGA-CV-5443-01) and STAD (TCGA-BR-8361-01). Aberrant transcripts are colored in red. (C) PD-L1–vInt4 was detected in some of the clinical samples. Data were obtained from CCLE.

Copyright © 2023 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN 2379-3708

Sign up for email alerts