Go to The Journal of Clinical Investigation
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
  • Physician-Scientist Development
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • By specialty
    • COVID-19
    • Cardiology
    • Immunology
    • Metabolism
    • Nephrology
    • Oncology
    • Pulmonology
    • All ...
  • Videos
  • Collections
    • In-Press Preview
    • Resource and Technical Advances
    • Clinical Research and Public Health
    • Research Letters
    • Editorials
    • Perspectives
    • Physician-Scientist Development
    • Reviews
    • Top read articles

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Specialties
  • In-Press Preview
  • Resource and Technical Advances
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Research Letters
  • Editorials
  • Perspectives
  • Physician-Scientist Development
  • Reviews
  • Top read articles
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
Genomic attributes of homology-directed DNA repair deficiency in metastatic prostate cancer
Navonil De Sarkar, … , Robert B. Montgomery, Peter S. Nelson
Navonil De Sarkar, … , Robert B. Montgomery, Peter S. Nelson
Published December 8, 2021
Citation Information: JCI Insight. 2021;6(23):e152789. https://doi.org/10.1172/jci.insight.152789.
View: Text | PDF
Research Article Oncology

Genomic attributes of homology-directed DNA repair deficiency in metastatic prostate cancer

  • Text
  • PDF
Abstract

Cancers with homology-directed DNA repair (HRR) deficiency exhibit high response rates to poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors (PARPi) and platinum chemotherapy. Though mutations disrupting BRCA1 and BRCA2 associate with HRR deficiency (HRRd), patterns of genomic aberrations and mutation signatures may be more sensitive and specific indicators of compromised repair. Here, we evaluated whole-exome sequences from 418 metastatic prostate cancers (mPCs) and determined that one-fifth exhibited genomic characteristics of HRRd that included Catalogue Of Somatic Mutations In Cancer mutation signature 3. Notably, a substantial fraction of tumors with genomic features of HRRd lacked biallelic loss of a core HRR-associated gene, such as BRCA2. In this subset, HRRd associated with loss of chromodomain helicase DNA binding protein 1 but not with mutations in serine-protein kinase ATM, cyclin dependent kinase 12, or checkpoint kinase 2. HRRd genomic status was strongly correlated with responses to PARPi and platinum chemotherapy, a finding that supports evaluating biomarkers reflecting functional HRRd for treatment allocation.

Authors

Navonil De Sarkar, Sayan Dasgupta, Payel Chatterjee, Ilsa Coleman, Gavin Ha, Lisa S. Ang, Emily A. Kohlbrenner, Sander B. Frank, Talina A. Nunez, Stephen J. Salipante, Eva Corey, Colm Morrissey, Eliezer Van Allen, Michael T. Schweizer, Michael C. Haffner, Radhika Patel, Brian Hanratty, Jared M. Lucas, Ruth F. Dumpit, Colin C. Pritchard, Robert B. Montgomery, Peter S. Nelson

×

Figure 2

Loss of heterozygosity and somatic mutation burden associated with HRR deficiency mutation signatures.

Options: View larger image (or click on image) Download as PowerPoint
Loss of heterozygosity and somatic mutation burden associated with HRR d...
(A) Loss of heterozygosity (LOH) scores in tumors with HRG-BAL (n = 53) versus tumors without HRG aberrations, excluding those with hypermutation (n = 349) (P < 0.01). (B) LOH scores between tumors classified as CSig3(+) (n = 81) and CSig3(–) (n = 317) (P < 0.03). (C) LOH score distribution across tumors with molecular aberrations involving DNA repair processes. Compared with LOH scores of tumors without HRG alterations (HRG-Intact), LOH scores are significantly higher in tumors with HRG germline loss (HRG-Germ), P = 0.005; biallelic loss of a core HRG (HRG-BAL), P = 0.014; monoallelic loss of multiple core HRGs (HRG-MML), P = 0.0009; and biallelic ATM alteration, P = 0.043. Tumors with biallelic cyclin dependent kinase 12 (CDK12) loss have LOH scores significantly below tumors with other HRG aberrations (P = 0.029). (D and E) Somatic single nucleotide variants (sSNVs) in tumors (D) with HRG-BAL (n = 54) or (E) classified as CSig3(+) (n = 81) versus CSig3(–) (n = 317) (P < 0.00001). (F) Distribution of sSNVs across tumors with molecular aberrations involving DNA repair processes. Compared with sSNVs/Mb in tumors without HRG (HRG-Intact) (n = 3.3 ± 2.3), sSNVs/Mb are significantly higher in tumors classified as HRG-Germ, HRG-BAL, and HRG-MML (P < 0.01). Within HRG-MAL and HRG-Intact, tumors classified as CSig3(+) had greater numbers of sSNVs compared with CSig3(–) tumors (P < 0.001). (G) Stratification of mPCs by iHRD classification status across germline and somatic alterations in genes involved in DNA repair (n = 418). (H and I) Frequency of CSig3(+) and iHRD(+) tumors in (H) the entire cohort of 418 tumors and (I) each genomic subclass. (A–F) Mann-Whitney U. FDR: * ≤ 0.05; ** < 0.01, *** < 0.001, **** < 0.0001, ***** < 0.00001.

Copyright © 2025 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN 2379-3708

Sign up for email alerts