Go to The Journal of Clinical Investigation
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
  • Physician-Scientist Development
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • By specialty
    • COVID-19
    • Cardiology
    • Immunology
    • Metabolism
    • Nephrology
    • Oncology
    • Pulmonology
    • All ...
  • Videos
  • Collections
    • In-Press Preview
    • Resource and Technical Advances
    • Clinical Research and Public Health
    • Research Letters
    • Editorials
    • Perspectives
    • Physician-Scientist Development
    • Reviews
    • Top read articles

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Specialties
  • In-Press Preview
  • Resource and Technical Advances
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Research Letters
  • Editorials
  • Perspectives
  • Physician-Scientist Development
  • Reviews
  • Top read articles
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
Propensity of IgA to self-aggregate via tailpiece cysteine-471 and treatment of IgA nephropathy using cysteamine
Xinfang Xie, Li Gao, Pan Liu, Jicheng Lv, Wan-Hong Lu, Hong Zhang, Jing Jin
Xinfang Xie, Li Gao, Pan Liu, Jicheng Lv, Wan-Hong Lu, Hong Zhang, Jing Jin
View: Text | PDF
Research Article

Propensity of IgA to self-aggregate via tailpiece cysteine-471 and treatment of IgA nephropathy using cysteamine

  • Text
  • PDF
Abstract

IgA nephropathy is caused by deposition of circulatory IgA1 in the kidney. Hypogalactosylated IgA1 has the propensity to form poly-IgA aggregates that are prone to deposition. Herein, we purified poly-IgA from the plasma of patients with IgA nephropathy and showed that the complex is susceptible to reducing conditions, suggesting intermolecular disulfide connections between IgA units. We sought to find the cysteine residue(s) that form intermolecular disulfide. Naturally assembled dimeric IgA, also known as secretory IgA, involves a J chain subunit connected with 2 IgA1 molecules via their penultimate cysteine-471 residue on a “tailpiece” segment of IgA heavy chain. It is plausible that, with the absence of J chain, the cysteine residue of mono-IgA1 might aberrantly form a disulfide bond in poly-IgA formation. Mutagenesis confirmed that cysteine-471 is capable of promoting IgA aggregation. These discoveries prompted us to test thiol-based drugs for stabilizing cysteine. Specifically, the cystine-reducing drug cysteamine used for treatment of cystinosis showed a remarkable potency in preventing self-aggregation of IgA. When administrated to rat and mouse models of IgA nephropathy, cysteamine significantly reduced glomerular IgA deposition. Collectively, our results reveal a potentially novel molecular mechanism for aberrant formation of IgA aggregates, to which the repurposed cystinosis drug cysteamine was efficacious in preventing renal IgA deposition.

Authors

Xinfang Xie, Li Gao, Pan Liu, Jicheng Lv, Wan-Hong Lu, Hong Zhang, Jing Jin

×

Figure 6

In vivo treatment of rats and mice with cysteamine lowers IgA deposition in the kidney in injection-induced IgAN models.

Options: View larger image (or click on image) Download as PowerPoint
In vivo treatment of rats and mice with cysteamine lowers IgA deposition...
(A–C) Rat model treated with cysteamine. (A) In a rat IgA deposition model, rats received a daily dose of cysteamine, or buffer control, followed by an injection of recombinant rat rIgA for 5 consecutive days. (B) Representative immunofluorescence images showed prominent rIgA deposition in glomeruli (Glom; arrowheads) in rats treated with buffer (n = 3), in contrast to weaker deposits in cysteamine-treated rats (n = 3). Additional kidney images are provided in Supplemental Figure 4A. (C) Quantitation of deposit in glomeruli between control and cysteamine treatment groups compared by t test (mean ± SEM, 1384 ± 290 MFI vs. 523 ± 76 MFI, n = 3 in each group). Significance between the 2 groups was determined by 2-tailed t test. (D) Mouse model of IgA deposition from injection of human IgA1 purified from human plasma. Each mouse was injected with a single dose of purified human IgA1 2 hours after pretreatment with either cysteamine or buffer control. (E) The buffer control mouse group (n = 6) had prominent IgA1 deposition in glomeruli (arrowheads). In contrast, pretreatment of the mice with cysteamine (n = 6) greatly reduced IgA1 deposition. Additional immunofluorescence images are shown in Supplemental Figure 4B. (F) Quantification of glomerular IgA1 intensity between buffer and cysteamine treatment groups (mean ± SEM, 2293 ± 163 MFI vs. 870 ± 193 MFI, n = 6 in each group). Significance between the 2 groups was determined by 2-tailed t test. Scale bar: 50 μm.

Copyright © 2026 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN 2379-3708

Sign up for email alerts