Go to The Journal of Clinical Investigation
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
  • Physician-Scientist Development
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • By specialty
    • COVID-19
    • Cardiology
    • Immunology
    • Metabolism
    • Nephrology
    • Oncology
    • Pulmonology
    • All ...
  • Videos
  • Collections
    • In-Press Preview
    • Resource and Technical Advances
    • Clinical Research and Public Health
    • Research Letters
    • Editorials
    • Perspectives
    • Physician-Scientist Development
    • Reviews
    • Top read articles

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Specialties
  • In-Press Preview
  • Resource and Technical Advances
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Research Letters
  • Editorials
  • Perspectives
  • Physician-Scientist Development
  • Reviews
  • Top read articles
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
Resistance to androgen receptor signaling inhibition does not necessitate development of neuroendocrine prostate cancer
W. Nathaniel Brennen, … , William B. Isaacs, John T. Isaacs
W. Nathaniel Brennen, … , William B. Isaacs, John T. Isaacs
Published March 16, 2021
Citation Information: JCI Insight. 2021;6(8):e146827. https://doi.org/10.1172/jci.insight.146827.
View: Text | PDF
Research Article Oncology

Resistance to androgen receptor signaling inhibition does not necessitate development of neuroendocrine prostate cancer

  • Text
  • PDF
Abstract

Resistance to AR signaling inhibitors (ARSis) in a subset of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancers (mCRPCs) occurs with the emergence of AR– neuroendocrine prostate cancer (NEPC) coupled with mutations/deletions in PTEN, TP53, and RB1 and the overexpression of DNMTs, EZH2, and/or SOX2. To resolve whether the lack of AR is the driving factor for the emergence of the NE phenotype, molecular, cell, and tumor biology analyses were performed on 23 xenografts derived from patients with PC, recapitulating the full spectrum of genetic alterations proposed to drive NE differentiation. Additionally, phenotypic response to CRISPR/Cas9-mediated AR KO in AR+ CRPC cells was evaluated. These analyses document that (a) ARSi-resistant NEPC developed without androgen deprivation treatment; (b) ARS in ARSi-resistant AR+/NE+ double-positive “amphicrine” mCRPCs did not suppress NE differentiation; (c) the lack of AR expression did not necessitate acquiring a NE phenotype, despite concomitant mutations/deletions in PTEN and TP53, and the loss of RB1 but occurred via emergence of an AR–/NE– double-negative PC (DNPC); (d) despite DNPC cells having homogeneous genetic driver mutations, they were phenotypically heterogeneous, expressing basal lineage markers alone or in combination with luminal lineage markers; and (e) AR loss was associated with AR promoter hypermethylation in NEPCs but not in DNPCs.

Authors

W. Nathaniel Brennen, Yezi Zhu, Ilsa M. Coleman, Susan L. Dalrymple, Lizamma Antony, Radhika A. Patel, Brian Hanratty, Roshan Chikarmane, Alan K. Meeker, S. Lilly Zheng, Jody E. Hooper, Jun Luo, Angelo M. De Marzo, Eva Corey, Jianfeng Xu, Srinivasan Yegnasubramanian, Michael C. Haffner, Peter S. Nelson, William G. Nelson, William B. Isaacs, John T. Isaacs

×

Figure 9

Characterization of LN-95 parental vs.

Options: View larger image (or click on image) Download as PowerPoint
Characterization of LN-95 parental vs.
total AR-KO cells. (A) Left panel...
total AR-KO cells. (A) Left panels are the histology (original magnification, ×200; inset [original magnification, ×400]); middle panels are the AR protein expression (original magnification, ×200); and right panels are the Ki67 expression (original magnification, ×200) of the PDXs. (B) Western blot documentation of the successful KO of AR protein in multiple clones of LN-95 cells. (C) IHC (original magnification, ×200) staining of parental LN-95 cells expressing both full-length AR (AR-FL) and AR variant 7 (AR-V7) vs. AR– PC-3 cells and the AR-KO clones using an N-terminal AR antibody and an AR-V7–specific antibody. (D) In vitro growth of the parental LN-95 cells vs. total AR-KO clones in 10% CS-FBS media, with asterisks denoting a significant difference at the P < 0.05 level. (E) RNA-Seq–based comparison of the expression of NE-specific and basal-specific genes in total AR-KO clones compared with parental LN-95 cells. (F) RNA-Seq–based comparison of the expression of AR-independent and AR-dependent luminal-specific genes in total AR-KO clones compared with parental LN-95 cells (note the significant difference in the magnitude of the y axis between panels). (G) In vivo growth of the total AR-KO clones vs. the parental LN-95 in castrated hosts. LN-95, LNCaP-95.

Copyright © 2025 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN 2379-3708

Sign up for email alerts